User talk:Rpavao3

Your article Revista da Biologia

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Revista da Biologia to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. (t) Josve05a (c) 16:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Revista da Biologia

The article Revista da Biologia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 09:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revista da Biologia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

Reply for proposed delection

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revista da Biologia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]