User talk:Rozi liu
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Rochester/Writing_on_Art_(fall_2024) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Rozi liu, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Dawn's Landscape XL
[edit]Please don't move this back to the mainspace in this state, it is not an acceptable Wikipedia article, it reads like an unfinished essay missing some basic characteristics of the subject and instead mainly discussing the artist. And then the actual discussion of the work starts with "Dawn's Landscape XL created in 1975." (please write sentences) and has no exhibition history, no current owner (private collection? museum? artist estate?)... hint The page has no categories, doesn't follow the standard structure of a Wikipedia article, starts with a quote which seems to have no relation to the work (or at least none that is explained)... Fram (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Rozi liu, instead of working on the draftified article, you have recreated Dawn's Landscape XL in mainspace. I have redirected this second version to the article on the artist, Louise Nevelson. You can find your text here if you want to use it to improve the draft (click on the time and date to see it as it was at each stage). When you think the draft is ready, add {{subst:submit}} and it will be evaluated by someone from Articles for Creation.
I considered overwriting the draft myself with your new version, but it contains over-close paraphrasing from the MAG source; in particular, "an aerial landscape, a model city" is copied verbatim. Copyright is taken very seriously on Wikipedia; the material from that and the other extended prose source, the book review, requires a thorough rewrite to summarize the information in your own words except for any necessary use of quotations marked as quotations. If there is also copying and/or close paraphrasing (substitution of individual words) in the draftified version, the same goes for that text. Courtesy ping to Nsayadi, course instructor. Yngvadottir (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)