User talk:Rozehawk
Welcome!
Hello, Rozehawk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
~ clearthought 22:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Help wanted
[edit]Hey. Along with Iowa13, I have been making an effort to create articles regarding either single seasons in Iowa Hawkeyes football history or stretches of seasons usually related to a certain time period or a coach's tenure. Given your track record in creating and contributing to articles related to the Iowa Hawkeyes, I was wondering if you would like to help. I am currently in the process of trying to get the 1889 - 1899 article up to good article status and any suggestions you could give would be much appreciated. Go Hawks! DanThaMan17 20:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Mark Catlin
[edit]I made a major change to the Mark Catlin article by changing it to Mark Catlin, Sr.. His son Mark Catlin, Jr. also served in the Wisconsin State Assembly and was the speaker. I would like to create more articles about the members of the Wisconsin State Legislature and Mark Catlin, Jr. is on my list. I hope there will be no problems-many thanks-RFD (talk) 20:00, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Iowa Hawkeyes football
[edit]Thanks for the clarification on the article. Obamafan70 (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
[edit]Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
- This permission does not give you any special status or authority
- Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
- You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
- If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
- If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Roll Along Iowa for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roll Along Iowa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roll Along Iowa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PGPirate 23:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harold Bradley, Sr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Englewood High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Rozehawk: I see that you have created the above article, while a draft article about the same oerson was being worked on for some time at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harold "Hal" Willard Bradley Sr. Did you write all of the text for your new article separately from the other article, or did you take and alter the text from the other article? I need to know, because in the second case I will request that the histories (the old versions) of the two articles be combined so that people can look back and see who has worked on it over time. However, if you wrote all of the text yourself, rather than altering the existing text, then the other article is redundant and will likely be deleted. Can you tell me what happened here? Thanks. —Anne Delong (talk) 06:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Rozehawk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Rozehawk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]The article Stub Barron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
same person as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_J._Barron, maybe look into merging the two articles
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)