User talk:Royalrumblebee

It is 10:02 AM where I live. If it's at night or during work time, I may not be online.

Your Edits on Inyi Town

Greetings. As per your edits on Inyi, Nigeria. You seem to have great knowledge of Inyi town. Is this some sort of autoethnography? Nevertheless, I'd prefer to use "About 1917" instead of your phrase, "By the turn of the twentieth century" in describing when Christianity came to the town. It feels more precise. Gracias. Diamondsee (talk) 10:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being more precise. My lack of that level of precision is evidence that I rely more on what I can get from secondary data found in journals and books about the town. Autoethnographs would roll more with oral tradition than secondary data. So, I am an enthusiast. Royalrumblebee (talk) 14:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Royalrumblebee. Thank you for your work on Omasi. User:Vanderwaalforces, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces:, I saw your wonderful edits on the page. Thank you for this and congratulations on your new reviewer status. Royalrumblebee (talk) 01:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Ejikeme Nwosu moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Patrick Ejikeme Nwosu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and see WP:SOLUTIONS. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Reading Beans (talk) 05:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I think, however that THE MULTIPLE sources cited met the four criteria which I learnt are "(1) reliable (2) secondary (3) independent of the subject and, (4) talk about the subject in some depth". I do not know how else to improve on sources beyond what have been provided from the national Nigerian newspapers I cited which talked about the subject to some depth and which are recognized by wikipedia as reliable newspapers. If there is something else you know, kindly share so that more knowledge is created and not extinguished. I will check the link you provided too for solutions. The angle which I may work more on may be the tone which you said appeared promotional. I will work to more neutrality. Thank you. Royalrumblebee (talk) 06:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Greg Mbajiorgu

Hello, Royalrumblebee,

Thank you for creating Greg Mbajiorgu.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

How did you get the image?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Reading Beans}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Reading Beans (talk) 09:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, Reading Beans. I will work on the page to clear these issues. How did I get the image? I took the snapshot myself at an academic seminar I attended and to which the biographee also came. He was demonstrating as a mono dramatist at the moment I took the picture. Thus, it is my own work. Royalrumblebee (talk) 22:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Johnbosco Onunkwo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Johnbosco Onunkwo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the subject is non-notable per WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:00, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. JohnBosco Onunkwo has actually been covered extensively in reliable national Nigerian newspapers up to 30 sources or more. I only provided about 15 in my conscious effort not to sound promotional, when it is not. He is notable per WP:GNG. I had to study the guidelines to be sure. I will work on the draft to find more sources and I am aware that founders of organizations which are famous and had contributed to a change in society (like the Nigerian elections or the covid-19 pandemic, in the case of Onunkwo) require more study. I hope the next review when I post will be more helpful. Royalrumblebee (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RRB. I know that this is old enough. Can you provide at least, three sources that suggestions that this subject is notable? Best, Reading Beans 14:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RB, I will dig more as you advised as per WP:GNG. Thank you. Royalrumblebee (talk) 20:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Patrick Ejikeme Nwosu

Hello, Royalrumblebee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patrick Ejikeme Nwosu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reminder. I have resubmitted it for review. Royalrumblebee (talk) 09:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ejikeme Patrick Nwosu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ejikeme Patrick Nwosu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ejikeme Patrick Nwosu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Emeritus Prof. for your concern towards making sure articles in Wikipedia are of very high standards. However, Sir, I respectfully assume that you saw the 2017 deletion notice and naturally added the deletion tag again, without realizing that so much work has gone into this re-direct article from 2017 to 2024 (seven years) and that the subject has become very notable in his country, Nigeria. As I write this, editors participating in the deletion discussion are already reflecting my view concerning this article and I am sure its inclusion in Wikipedia will further enrich the encyclopedia in its minute level, rather than bring it to disrepute. I recommend that you re-assess its contents after reading the comments from editors participating in the discussion. Thank you so much, Sir. And I am actually a fan of your academic contributions to this world. Royalrumblebee (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request

How I go take reach you? I get deal my oga Peaq1 (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and welcome to my talk page. Sorry, but Oga, your message is off. I guess you are new to Wikipedia's journalese. You could simply talk here or we discuss via any contact you may provide or reach me here (royalrumblebee111@gmail.com). But I hope this "deal" is not something unprofessional or against Wikipedia policies. Royalrumblebee (talk) 06:08, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Royalrumblebee. Thank you for your work on Emeka Mamah. Another editor, Ibjaja055, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article. However, read more on reliable sources. A typed CV uploaded to Google drive is not a reliable source because it has no verifiability. I have removed the sources but do well to take note of that in your future articles.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ibjaja055}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ibjaja055 (talk) 08:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for this information. Like you kindly instructed, I will humbly abreast myself of more of the policies. Royalrumblebee (talk) 09:22, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nelson Aluya

The article Nelson Aluya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual which fails WP:GNG. Very few reliable sources found to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tinton5 (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I read this is in good faith. I gently suggest that you carefully re-read the provisions in WP:NEXIST. Also, as per WP:SIGCOV and (especially) WP:BASIC, sources present in that article are clearly sufficient and pass, but as instructed by your tag, I will get more sources and do the needful. Royalrumblebee (talk) 11:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some work to it and as it is, the subject even passes WP:ANYBIO (see first provision on well-known and significant awards) for having been awarded the Black History Month award and the Paramount Care Centers Humanitarian Award in the United States. Royalrumblebee (talk) 13:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello Royalrumblebee. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Royalrumblebee. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Royalrumblebee|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my! You are very mistaken, dear editor. I love to create biographies of people and histories of towns as I had indicated already in my opening page. Paid editors can easily be caught because they create topics that are not notable, using sources that are mostly primary or not significant. I only create articles that already have significant coverage and notability but have not been represented in Wikipedia. I was surprised to see your tag about multiple primary sources in one of my creations, when almost 98 percent of the references were secondary sources from national newspapers that even have wiki pages here. I humbly suggest you investigate carefully. The only intention which I am sure is correct in my mind is that Nigerian notable personalities are under-represented in Wikipedia, especially women, and I want to help correct that anomaly. Finally, I read all the notability policies carefully before beginning to edit. Thank you. Royalrumblebee (talk) 10:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a lot of words to say nothing at all.

Please give a simple "yes" or "no"

Until you give a clear, direct, precise answer, you have not provided an answer. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. I am not a paid editor and I frown at that idea, even the assumption from anyone that I might be one.

My first "wordy" reply above is inspired by your first instruction: "please state that in response to this message", and also because I do not want a response from you that may go this way: "I am not convinced by your answer". Thank you. Royalrumblebee (talk) 23:33, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your clarity. That was all that was required. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Royal, I asking you about how you got an image of an article some months back. In this deletion discussion in Commons you said that you took these images yourself. You can, of course, edit for money or write about someone you know (see WP:COI) as long as you're making the required disclosures. If you're going to insist you're not being compensated, then it would be a good idea to tune down the weasel and promotional words used in this articles. You can look at the articles of more experienced editors and model yours, it might help. Thank you for closing the content gap in Nigerian articles. Best, Reading Beans 09:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, dear RB. I will do just as you have suggested. Royalrumblebee (talk) 12:27, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Critical Reception

Hi RoyalRB, I am impressed with your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your intention to focus on creating topics about Nigerian notables. Your recent topic on Dolly Nwaduba is one example, but I think you should include a section on "Critical Reception" to help grow analysis on the Nigerian entertainment industry. See Frank Sinatra Jr. to understand more. Diamondsee (talk) 13:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Diamondsee. Aaargh, actually nothing stops other editors from creating the section, especially including you. I admit it is new to me. I will have to study what "critical reception" means. But, please, start the section and I will follow.

Meanwhile, assuming you know, biko achorom ima ka esi etinye table awards na nominations. Royalrumblebee (talk) 14:35, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Diamondsee, I don’t encourage using “critical reception” section in any biographical article. That sort of subsection are used in novels, films but not in a biography. See MOS:SECTIONSTYLE. Royal, do you mean {{Awards table}}? If not, let me know let me help you with the desired template. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:44, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RB, you saved me the energy! I would have gone the wrong alley and learnt the hard way. @Diamondsee, inugo kwa ife nwanne anyi Duke ndi Rivia kwuru?

Yes, @Reading Beans, you got it; that is exactly the award template as desired. Thank you for this! Royalrumblebee (talk) 16:02, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, @Reading Beans. Thanks for the update. You're nwanne too. I will learn more. Diamondsee (talk) 17:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No biggie umunne’m. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:42, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dolly Nwaduba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Benin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]