User talk:Royalhistorian

Welcome, Royalhistorian!

Hello, Royalhistorian, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Clamster5, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help pages

Tutorial

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

<3 Clamster5

Matthew Lyle Spencer

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Matthew Lyle Spencer, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://users.panola.com/AAGHS/ARTICLES/SPENCER.html. As a copyright violation, Matthew Lyle Spencer appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Matthew Lyle Spencer has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Matthew Lyle Spencer. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Matthew Lyle Spencer, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Daniel .Bryant 09:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have sole copyright to all material. 72.24.148.150 (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Good Cheer

I was actually there to add the cleanup template, but I would be glad to help with the Good Cheer. --Lemonflash|_{(say hi)} 21:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Lyle Spencer article

Dr.,

On the M. Spencer article talk page, you noted:

Just a short note to let you know that the article on Spencer is from articles written by the author over the past three years for the Panola Story, Le Despencer, and American National Biography. It also became a short book in 1998. In some cases, statements are taken verbatim from the aforementioned articles. Spencer's 1908 wedding is from the author's article "The Spencer-Hill Wedding: a Time of Joy," which appeared in the Spring 1992 issue of Wofford Today.

Royalhistorian 00:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Can you clarify that the book is in the public domain or GNU ? I understand the website at Panola is, but I wanted to make sure the book is as well; otherwise major edits may need to take place to ensure the article is not a copyright violation. Guroadrunner 07:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The booklet "Matthew Lyle Spencer was published in private publication by North Mississippi Antiquarian and Historical Society in Oxford, Mississippi in 1995. Please feel free to edit it as you see fit. Thank you for you input Carl 72.24.148.150 (talk) 02:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ask for help

Would you mind add some references of the Inter-service decorations of the United States military?

Thank you.--东北虎(Manchurian Tiger) 09:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

72.24.148.150 (talk) 02:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Lindgren. I have redirected the user page and user talk page from the account User:DrLindgren back to this account. This is as close as we can come to deleting the account, and it allows people to follow your comments under the other account back to the one you are currently using. Thanks for your patience. Please note that you should not use that other account any longer, in order to avoid any appearance of impropriety (some users abuse multiple accounts, to sway consensus on controversies or avoid blocks, and you don't want to get grouped in with those folks). Pastordavid (talk) 00:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pasterdavid.

Thank you very much. As stated above, I am no longer related to the site DrLindgren.

Royalhistorian (talk) 01:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ODM

Hi there Royalhistorian, an anon ip removed you name from the participnats list of WP:ODM per this diff. Was this intended? Regards. Woody (talk) 02:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I must have accidently deleted it myself. I have re-entered the information. Royalhistorian (talk) 08:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Priory of Sion Peer Review

Hello. You would be interested in participating in the peer review of the Priory of Sion article? --Loremaster (talk) 11:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oriental Rosicrucian Order

Hi, I see from WikiProject Occult that you're interested in Rosicrucian articles. I've just run across one in the Dead end section that could do with a little attention and I was wondering if you'd be interested. The article is Oriental Rosicrucian Order. If not, no worries.

Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Unfortunately, I know pretty much absolutely nothing about Rosicrucianism, so I'll not be much help. I'm mostly doing house keeping stuff; links to dab pages, categorising, dead end pages, the occasional orphan page that kind of thing. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 08:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Saint Anthony (Ethiopia)

Please, can you take a look to Order of Saint Anthony (Ethiopia)? Date of founding in 370 is maybe only legendary and you are one of best scholars in this field. Thank you --Yopie 10:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I am very interested in helping with this entry as I was offered a grand cross in the order in 2001. However, I declined the offer as I had questions relating to its legality.

Prof. Carl Edwin Lindgren Royalhistorian (talk)

Carl Lindgren

Dear Sir, sometimes it is better to write this kind of comments, you write to my talk page, to the talk page of the article, because this kind of information is useful for editors to improve the content of the original article. Have a nice day. --MaNeMeBasat (talk) 09:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I wrote it on your page to cause less issues. However, it seems to be of little importance in the long run. I simply do not believe it is worth pursuing any further. Again, thank you for your time and advice.

Carl Edwin Lindgren Royalhistorian (talk) 02:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ping

I sent you an email. DGG (talk) 19:37, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental move?

Hi Royal, I just wanted to let you know that the way you moved your comment at this AfD discussion [1] has kind of messed the order up a bit. I think maybe it was an accident and you were worried about the notice of listings and just trying to move it below that or something? Those often go in randomly when notice is posted on the relevant pages. Anyway, you might want to take a look and see if it needs to be fixed. Normally I would have fixed it for you, but there seems to be animosity between the nominator and one of the editors, so I don't want to encourage any paranoia. Let me know if you have any questions. Take care. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I see my link didn't help very much. Ooops. Sorry about that. I think this link is the one [2]. Anyway, I wasn't worried about it, but I wanted to give you a friendly heads up as I wasn't sure if you knew what you had done or if you were moving it for a reason or what... Let me know if I can be of any help with anything and thanks for contributing at AfD and on Wikipedia. Take care and Happy Holidays. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THank you very much. Merry Christmas. Carl Royalhistorian (talk) 06:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas Carl. I enjoy reading your insights at AfD. I hope we'll do some editing together in the new year! ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:59, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

la Sociedad Heráldica Española

You've been involved in a couple of articles that mention this as a source. Are you aware it is a private venture? [3] [4] [5]. As you don't seem to be around much, if you want to reply could you reply on my talk page please? Thanks. dougweller (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Royalhistorian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

College of Preceptors

Hi, this page is about an old extinct society operating until 1923. It was not well known and well documented. It seems that you are running a new societ with a similar or even the same name, which claims to be the same society. There appears to be no linkage between the two and there was no operation for over 50 years between 1923 and the time when the new society started its operation. Until the link is proven it is best that you first open a new wiki page for his society. It will be easier. It is also best that the matters are first resolved here on the talk page of the College of Preceptors. Talk pages are very good places for such matters. Topjur01 (talk) 07:26, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Royalhistorian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Noble Compañia de Ballesteros Hijosdalgo de San Felipe y Santiago for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noble Compañia de Ballesteros Hijosdalgo de San Felipe y Santiago is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noble Compañia de Ballesteros Hijosdalgo de San Felipe y Santiago until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

toweli (talk) 13:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Académie Belgo-Espagnole d'Histoire

The article Académie Belgo-Espagnole d'Histoire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

it clearly exists, but I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the organization in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]