User talk:RowsdowerSavesUs

Welcome!

Hello, RowsdowerSavesUs, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Aaron Renn, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Equine-man (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aaron Renn

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Aaron Renn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Equine-man (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied in the Talk section of the article in order to contest the nomination. On top of defending the information included in the entry, as well as providing an argument for the notability of the subject of the entry, I'm also requesting you to identify specific areas of text which are promotional in nature. Please provide some specific guidance on what should be changed about the article. RowsdowerSavesUs (talk) 00:38, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is not notable. No reliable sources. Only serves to promote or publicise the person. Equine-man (talk) 00:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just because they aren't personally familiar to you doesn't mean they aren't notable. This is a specific realm of religious and social thought, and publications like First Things, American Affairs, City Journal, the American Conservative, Mere Orthodoxy, and others all hold weight in the specific intellectual circles the entry was written about. You have only your finite experience of the world, so it's not obvious that your personal judgment of what is notable is more accurate than anyone else is. I'm sure there is something you personally think is notable that I don't find notable at all. Not a good measure, clearly.

Also, you didn't point out any specifics about the entry which should be changed or improved. You clearly have no interest in improving the entry. RowsdowerSavesUs (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! RowsdowerSavesUs, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:46, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aaron Renn

Hello, RowsdowerSavesUs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aaron Renn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aaron Renn

Hello, RowsdowerSavesUs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aaron Renn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]