User talk:Rovers Forever2

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Barry O'Connor, Rovers Forever2!

Wikipedia editor Bensci54 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Overall a a good article. It could be improved with the addition of a picture.

To reply, leave a comment on Bensci54's talk page.

Welcome

Hello, Rovers Forever2, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:57, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Where are we with this? An explanation is needed as to why those notable pages have not been restored. Rovers Forever2 (talk) 17:11, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have access to my original account. I am responsible for creating the pages of Neil Poutch, Ricky McEvoy and Barry O'Connor. Why not address the vandal that deleted these notable pages? Again I am not concerned what happens here as long as those notable pages are restored.

I did that numerous times. Neil Poutch, Ricky McEvoy and Barry O'Connor pages should be restored. It does not matter who takes credit for them. It beggars belief that GiantSnowman is allowed to vandalise under the pretence of being an administrator here.

If you want an unblock to be considered then request one via your original account. Pointing fingers and blaming others when you alone are responsible for your actions will get you nowhere (I mean this literally as your talk page access will be revoked).--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 01:07, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rovers Forever2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My reason

Decline reason:

You'll need to request unblock from your original account. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:36, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was unfairly blocked the last time with no proper explanation. If I had wanted to evade blocks I would not have chosen this name. And as I stated before I have consistently added notable pages here.

It is not acceptable to delete pages created. All 3 pages, Neil Poutch, Ricky McEvoy and Barry O'Connor are notable and for that user to delete them is quite frankly embarrassing, petty and childish.

Wikipedia is failing if there are people who spend their whole lives deleting pages. It should be a source of information and not used by some with god like tendencies.

You could at least have these pages restored. Rovers Forever2 (talk) 20:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rovers Forever2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WHY?

Decline reason:

Because it's not acceptable to evade blocks on your original account. Max Semenik (talk) 20:09, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why on earth am I blocked? I added information with sources to Tommy Keane's page? Rovers Forever2 (talk) 19:37, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]