User talk:Roughstrikes

Welcome!

Hello, Roughstrikes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rich Farmbrough, 14:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Disruption

You have to be a little more precise - which edits are disruptive and why? have you tried to talk to these editors? Rich Farmbrough, 14:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

For example, do you disagree that his height is 6' 1" ? Rich Farmbrough, 14:54, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Information - disruption

sure, will give explanation The user 180.106.5.60, 117.82.98.99 have used senseless edits and peacock terms like extraordinary, Most popular and extremly talented, to spoil the integrity and quality of article and are used excessively to defame and mask some of the facts in the article. some edits are also being done in removing the reflist Tag in the references section.

I request a strong scrutiny and surveillance on this article on the use of Unexplained edits by any IP ADDRESS AND USE OF PEACOCK TERMS. IN THE NEXT DUBIOUS EDIT USING PEACOCK TERMS OR DISRUPTING REFERENCE TAGS, PLEASE UNDO THE EDIT AND SEMI PROTECT THE ARTICLE.

I am not interested in things like Height of the person. What I look for is a semi protection of this article.

And peacock term which try to mislead real facts of the article.

(Roughstrikes (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

The article is full of vague uncited information. X was a "super hit". I agree the IP additions are even worse than the article as it was, but not by a lot. They can be removed and talked about, the rule is "Bold, Revert Discuss" - not "Bold, revert, protect." I have made a start on cleaning up the article. Rich Farmbrough, 15:40, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Images

Unfortunately that image is likely to be copyright. You can request an image by adding {{Image requested}} to the talk page. Or if you can get an image released under CC-by-sa ideally uploaded by the creator, we can use that. Rich Farmbrough, 16:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

It is presumably copyright by Mitr, who uploaded it to the site. I see nothing saying they release under license. It may not even be Mitr's own work but copied form elsewhere. Rich Farmbrough, 17:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I had a look on Commons, and on Flikr, there are many images on Flikr, but no obviously free ones. Might be worth a careful check and even asking for something to be released by it's creator . http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Akkineni%20Nagarjuna&w=all Rich Farmbrough, 17:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Image - continued

will try,

I presume - the below image is by the originator, since it has a tag

''http://www.teluguone.com/cinema/gallery/Nagarjuna/nagarjuna1.jpg''

and further, I can post {{Image requested}} to this talk page???