User talk:Rotovia
You would not happen to be the Rotovia from NationStates, would you? --OuroborosCobra 14:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I actually am Rotovia 08:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there! I used to be Mannatopia on there, we interacted some. --OuroborosCobra 22:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I remember. Are you still on NS? I hardly go on these days. Rotovia 01:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Citations missing templates
[edit]The date syntax is: {{Citations missing|any other arguments|date=December 2007}}, but if you leave the date off it will be added by a WP:BOT. (Note refers to Statism.) Rich Farmbrough, 16:47 21 December 2007 (GMT).
What you propose is honestly just not workable. It's not compatible with what should be happening with new page patrolling in my opinion. If I had noticed that content was hidden in the manner you describe, I would have certainly not gone with the db template. At the same time, there are plenty of bizarre article fragments that need be deleted speedily or they will escape into the depths of the project until some random page request happens to pull the unlinked and abandoned fragment up. I recognize that speedy deletion is not the friendliest of processes in general, but it's a necessary one. Erechtheus (talk) 03:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think irresponsibility is a bit extreme a characterization. I clicked edit. I saw what filled the edit box was a infobox I saw existed and would, were it essentially the whole article as it appeared, qualify the article for db-a1. I didn't notice the scroll bar and wasn't expecting to find hidden content buried. I think it's unfortunate that things just happened to go they way they did, but I think it's very understandable how it worked out that way. At any rate, happy editing. Erechtheus (talk) 03:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Invitation
[edit]
Introducing WikiProject United States Government...[edit]
| |||
.svg)
|
Hello Rotovia,
Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief. Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying. Thanks in advance, « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 22:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Help us get the project off the ground and flying. |
|
I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Emily Hagins, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! --KenWalker | Talk 19:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Cyprus v Turkey (Attila Olgac Testimony of Alledged 1974 War Crimes)
[edit]Hi, I'd ask you to revisit your contribution here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus v Turkey (Attila Olgac Testimony of Alledged 1974 War Crimes). Thanks. cheers, Rd232 talk 13:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for responding, but you've not really clarified your view (and you've !voted a second time). Please clarify which allegations are notable? Attila Olgac's retracted talk show remarks about having personally committed war crimes? Or the much more general Cyprus invasion war crimes allegations? Please be clear in your answers. Rd232 talk 08:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm happy with my submission, you can seek more information if you desire further clarity Rotovia (talk) 01:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Socialist Alternative (Australia)
[edit]Please do not add uncited dubious material to Socialist Alternative (Australia). thanks. Fifelfoo (talk) 09:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Source cited, more on the way. Rotovia (talk) 01:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Its not an adequate citation, as it doesn't provide a page number for your assertion. It is highly dubious that the ACTU analysed their union's membership lists for a miniscule trot sect's membership, if they were even able to get a membership return out of Soc Alt. Fifelfoo (talk) 04:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Your reference as supplied does not exist as a published document. Fifelfoo (talk) 04:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Additional sources are available, politically motivated editing is discouraged Rotovia (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Rotovia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Rotovia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:46, 16 December 2017 (UTC)