User talk:Ross Lawhead
Welcome!
[edit]Hello Ross Lawhead, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some good places to get you started!
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Template messages
- Sandbox
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes (~~~) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!
FireFox T C E 17:49, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
Chesterbelloc
[edit]About the Chesterbelloc - it comes to me that a good response to your proposal would be to start an in-depth discussion at G. K.'s Weekly. That already has some key facts as ballast: Cecil, the Marconi scandal, the whole thread or 'project' laid out over the decades. Charles Matthews 19:25, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
CoolRoss Lawhead 08:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Wiki-Links
[edit]Dear Ross,
Just a quick note to let you know that when you make an internal link, as with Orthodoxy on the Chesterton page, you only need to link the first reference and not all subsequent references.
Also when you linking an italicised word make sure the apostrophes are outside the brackets. Otherwise it look like this ''Orthodoxy''.
I hope this is useful.
Iron Ghost 15:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
The Everlasting Man
[edit]Thanks, those edits were improvements. (Not all are, as you are very aware.)
I read one of your dad's books years ago, and have the project of getting some of them and yours to read, simmering on my back burner.
--Lavintzin 14:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Brut (Layamon)
[edit]Is there any strict Wikipedia policy that this perfectly legitimate article of yours on the Brut (Layamon) should be so very much shorter than its (overly?) long treatment within the article on Layamon (the person)? I would suggest transferring the bulk of the Brut section from Layamon to your article.--Kudpung (talk) 06:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Wonder Voyage
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Wonder Voyage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 22:00, 9 July 2018 (UTC)