User talk:Rosenthal88

Welcome!

Hello, Rosenthal88, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tom Rosenthal, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pichpich (talk) 17:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Rosenthal

The article Tom Rosenthal has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Pichpich (talk) 17:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Your recent edit to the page Robert Enke appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 16:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Enke, you may be blocked from editing. HalfShadow 21:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Robert Enke, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ʄlame (report mistake) 21:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pub

Prove you met Robert Enke at the pub last week. Us441(talk)(contribs) 22:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How can I believe you? Us441(talk)(contribs) 22:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Enke, you may be blocked from editing. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 19:28, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Enke, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Simply continuing to edit the article to make it seem like he is still alive and then reverting any reversions of your edits will only get you blocked again for a very long time, in all probability. You yourself are not a reliable source, thus, the fact that you claim to have met him at the pub is really quite irrelevant. Unless you can find a source saying that Enke somehow faked getting hit by a train, keep it off the page. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 19:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You've been blocked for your disruption. See here. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:24, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]