User talk:Rosemary82

Welcome...

Hello, Rosemary82, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Huldra (talk) 07:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I would like to thank you for all the articles you have started. I have added them to Wikipedia:WikiProject Palestine/New articles, so that more editors will be aware of them, Regards, Huldra (talk) 07:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fareed N. Fareed

I have nominated Fareed N. Fareed, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fareed N. Fareed. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —Noah 21:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Dear Rosemary82, I've seen a lot of new articles by you and just wanted to say welcome and that your work is appreciated. You might want to add seomthing to your user page, even if just one sentence, so that it stops showing up as a redlink. Anyway, keep up the good work. Tiamut^talk 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Palestine

WikiProject Palestine is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Palestine on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of members at WikiProject Palestine. Ahlan wa Sahlan! (Welcome!)

--Al Ameer son (talk) 03:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kadima election

Hi Rosemary! Please do not remove templates like {{Update}} from articles for no good reason. Clearly, the Kadima election article has not been updated as requested. Cheers, Ynhockey ^(Talk) 02:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! As I noted in my edit summary, there are a few things missing from the article which were made known only recently. In particular, the following:

Reactions from notable bodies. International reactions may be too much to ask at this point (although it's certainly possible to include them), but at least reactions by the participants and main Israeli parties should be included. Mofaz's disappointment and accusations of bad election management, and almost the same statements from Dichter. I'm not sure what Sheetrit said, but it should be included as well.
Actions of each participant directly as a result of the elections. I don't have much knowledge on this, but for example Mofaz practically announced his retirement, and then came back almost immediately (I added this myself).
Livni's coalitions talks are notable and required for this article to be notable (regular primaries are generally non-notable). For now this might not need to be covered because they're not over yet and anything can happen, but if the article itself was written before the primaries started, I can't see why basic information about coalitions talks cannot be added. Remember that these talks will decide if Livni will become the next PM, and she has 42 days (since the election) to form a government.

-- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 17:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMEU links

Please stop adding them to pages. They have been removed by at least two other editors besides myself who consider them to be inappropriate. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7

Because it's a Palestinian website, and therefore has inherent bias. I think the clearest example of this is the introduction to the Gil party: "Party leader Rafi Eitan, a former top Mossad operative, is considered by the United States as a co-conspirator in the Jonathan Pollard spy case. In September 2008 he declared in an interview with a German magazine that Israel should kidnap Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad". This is clearly unrepresentative of what the party is and what it stands for. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 16:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The website states that it covers "information about Palestine and the Palestinians", so I don't see why its info on Israeli topics is important. It's also clearly biased (as shown above, so is inappropriate). Anyway, another editor is now reverting your edits, so please stop. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 16:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No they are not, and that is why you are being reverted by four different editors. Please stop, or you will be blocked. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 17:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I myself am a Wikipedia administrator, but you are more than welcome to take the issue to WP:ANI, as I think it's clear to all who has the bias here (I'll give you a clue: It's usually the person claiming that their viewpoints are being censored). пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 18:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop inserting the links. Marking other users' edits as vandalism is also poor practice. Consider this a final warning. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 15:16, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Err, given that Lieberman is an Israeli politician, a piece from an Israeli source seems to be fine. Like I said, you're more than welcome to go to WP:ANI. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 15:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I didn't remove the link from the Lieberman article - that was one of the many other editors who are removing your edits. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 15:27, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rosemary82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Accused of spamming when only defending relevant links against unjustified deletion, this is purely a content dispute, as defined in wikipedia's guidelines, for which blocking is NOT permitted

Decline reason:

I'm afraid that, by adding links to the same web site to multiple articles, and presenting the appearance that adding that link is your primary purpose for using Wikipedia, you are currently in violation of WP:SPAM, regardless of the merits of the link. In edit-warring to keep your preferred version up, you also appear to be in violation of the three-revert rule on several articles. Instead of edit-warring, when your block expires, why not use the talk page to discuss the merits of this link, seeking consensus from other editors?— FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:54, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for for ignoring several warnings above to stop adding inappropriate external links, which had been removed by numerous users.[1][2][3], as well as marking such edits as vandalism [4]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 15:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMEU

Before you start adding the links again, I suggest you take the advice of FisherQueen and bring the subject to WT:Israel for discussion. Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 09:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tareq Abboushi

The article Tareq Abboushi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability requirements of WP:MUSICBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LimonesMI (talk) 01:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Muna Handal-Dayeh

The article Muna Handal-Dayeh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO. Nothing in google news. 1 small hit in google books.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]