User talk:Rosejacob1

Welcome

Hello Rosejacob1 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to the page P. J. Kurien, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! lTopGunl (talk) 11:55, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Suryanelli rape case with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Suryanelli rape case with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dea db eef 07:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Incorrect marking of edits as 'minor'

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to P. J. Kurien, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 15:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poor edit summaries

Comments such as "Some person intentionally editing this section to ridicule a famous politician" in edit summaries, as you said here on 19 January 2015, are unacceptable. They may fall under Wikipedia:No personal attacks (NPA). It is irrelevant that a person is a 'famous' politician. What matters is what is reported in reliable sources. If you have a problem with something on a page, and are reverted when you remove it, do not Edit war, take it to the talk page of that article for discurssion. 220 of ^Borg 15:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]