User talk:RoseGold1250/Archive 3

Bravely Default 2

Heyo. Just so ya know, you used the wrong message. My edit was not about any living persons at all. But rather, it was about additions to the plot of Bravely Default 2 that had been left out. 67.174.79.185 (talk) 18:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plz

Plz see the Hinduism in Bangladesh and religion in Bangladesh Wikipedia pages. I have given reliable source for religion but the user deleted it by blaming me that I have added false allegations.

This same ip has been deleting and readding things for the past 6 months if you check the history he removed sources that put the hindu population and said they were based on assumptions while he is doing the same now. 92.40.182.219

RizaNova

Hello. This article is not written for any advertising and is neutral. The parts found to be advertising were edited and corrected by another user. Sources are sufficient. Why are you nominating this article for speedy deletion? Asadbek Botirqulov (talk) 02:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Special Election

Look, Rose, I gave reasons why I undid that. We are going to base a claim that someone won the second place in the runoff on just a newspaper's argument without any of the networks backing it up. It would be best if we waited for a few minutes, or hours depending on how long it takes, for other networks to confirm who the winner will be for that second runoff place. Basing it off of one source is a bad idea, and most election pages usually have multiple news sources making the call on who won officially, instead of just relying on one source. It should be best if we wait and see for certain to see who won that second place.2607:FEA8:88A0:3B57:E4A1:D2C4:ADF1:362B (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Herman Cain's Death

I explained why I removed the editorial language. The language removed was extraneous and biased. You and me may personally agree that masks are important but Herman's opposition to wearing masks, while relevant, screams bias, soapboxing, and messaging. The language that I removed is litigating the importance of wearing a masks and essentially says "Herman didn't listen to the experts who say masks are important and look what happened to him." The removed verbiage doesn't belong. My edit was aimed at sticking to the facts.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article on the same subject. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This sandbox draft does not appear to warrant a standalone article; especially as there is no sourcing included with the item. Merging to the existing article on the general topic would seem the preferred option.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RoseGold1250/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:RoseGold1250/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RoseGold1250! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear terrorism edits

Hello, I saw that you removed the sections about radiological terrorism I added to the Nuclear Terrorism article. Could you explain why, so I can improve them? Thank you CWO540 (talk) 04:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much

Thanks for prevent vandalism Solider789 (talk) 05:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Iowa gov race

Hi. Some stuff on that page was wrong, I tried to change it but I’m pants with technology. Looks like it is fixed now, so thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.215.101.51 (talk) 03:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LoanDepot Park

Hi RoseGold1250, I am in the process of copyediting the LoanDepot Park article and I made changes to summarize and boil down the information in that article for readability. It may seem that I have blanked section in the article, and that you have reverted those edits, however I have made careful arrangements to ensure that pertinent information remains in the article while making sure that the article is streamlined for encyclopedic content. Could you please review and reinstate my edits? Thank you. 73.205.211.130 (talk) 19:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS, I have also left notes on that article’s talk page. Please let me know how I could go about improving that article. Thank you. 73.205.211.130 (talk) 19:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]