User talk:RoscoePecoe
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy on attribution and verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A blog is not a credible source for information. -- KirinX 15:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- That's fine, I can understand why a blog is not considered a reliable source. I don't have a problem with this. I do have a problem with you identifying this as vandalism. That was not the intent. You should remove that immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoscoePecoe (talk • contribs) 15:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I am afraid it's not possible to remove the 'reason' for my reverting your edit, but rest assured, it's just an edit summary, and is not a driving factor in people's decisions when dealing with other vandalism, or good edits, for that matter. -- KirinX 15:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Possible sock-puppetry
[edit]I am watching your account and that of User:Foppyfloppy in accordance with Wikipedia's Sock Puppetry rules. If you are the same person, choose one account. If you are not, please forgive this warning. Sock puppets are not allowed, and should not be used to make the same edits repeatedly (also known as edit warring). -- KirinX 15:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)