User talk:Rosaenv

Welcome!

Hello, Rosaenv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Willy Monfret, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jinkinson talk to me 18:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Willy Monfret

The article Willy Monfret has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jinkinson talk to me 18:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GLOWINTHEDARK

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Helpsome (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'm so sorry! Thank you. I've already adjusted the article a few times, how do I know it's good? Because the maintenance template remains. I've adjusted the article GLOWINTHEDARK a few times and have paid really close attention to the feedback but the maintenance template remains on the page. Does this mean the page is still not good? Sure there has to be a few things that are okay now since the changes I've made? What can I do? Really want this page to be good but I'm a bit stuck now.

Also the page of Willy Monfret might not meet the lay out guidelines of Wikipedia, I've adjusted this and read the guidelines but it still isn't right according to the maintenance template. Can someone please tell me what exactly needs to be improved here?Rosaenv (talk) 12:13, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to {{help me}} request: I've made some changes to the maintenance tags on both articles to reflect the edits you have done. In future if you feel you have corrected the error, you may remove the tags yourself per this policy. Both subjects still fail Wikipedia notability guidelines because the articles have no references which assert that the subjects are important in an encyclopedic sense. Please read the notability guidelines and find sources which will allow those tags to be removed. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 14:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Willy Monfret may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Willy Monfret may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

<ref>{{cite web|title=Nicki Minaj - Right Thru Me Official Music Video (Behind The Scenes)|url=http:/http:/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edited GLOWINTHEDARK

I have edited GLOWINTHEDARK and removed the following maintenance tags:

{{notability}}
{{unreliable sources}}

I've added multiple references from different kinds of sources. Also I've checked the wikipedia notability guidelines and believe that the sources I've added are reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosaenv (talk • contribs) 12:23, 31 January 2014‎

I have put the {{notability}} tag back on the article, and I have changed the {{resume}} to the correct maintenance tag {{like resume}}. Please post any more discussion about these issues on the article talk page here: Talk:GLOWINTHEDARK, and not on your personal user page. Thanks. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 15:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Willy Monfret

The article Willy Monfret has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no indication that this person meets Wikipedia notability guidelines for musicians. Authors should read the guidelines and provide evidence that this person is notable by Wikipedia standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 12:58, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Willy Monfret for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willy Monfret is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willy Monfret until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 05:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You posted on my talk page regarding Willy Monfret article improvements. As stated in the deletion nomination message on the article page, the correct place to have this discussion is here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willy Monfret. This page is where the deletion of the article is discussed. And you should post there soon because the nomination was 4 days ago and discussion is normally closed after 7 days. Right now there is no objection to the deletion whatsoever. If you want to halt the deletion process, you need to make your case there. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 13:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Willy Monfret

An article that you edited has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willy Monfret. Due to lack of discussion the article has now been relisted twice. If you have a chance could you please stop by and weigh in on the deletion debate. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 14:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As part of Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron, I have visited the page you created on Willy Monfret and made some needed improvements. I have also added a lengthy support note on the discussion for deletion page. Hope the article does get through with more improvements. Many thanks for introducing this individual to the Wikipedia pages. Frankly a French language page is more needed as it will create understandably more interest. werldwayd (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Monfret

I have a copy of the article at User:Sportfan5000/Monfret that can be added to with more sources and re-introduced later on, you can also use it for a French wiki, or wherever else makes sense. Sportfan5000 (talk) 17:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Hope this helps although I'm not sure what more I can do. Also thank you User:Werldwayd for your help! User:Rosaenv

Deleted Page

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Recently the Willy Monfret wiki has been deleted. I would like to know what to do so I can re-introduce the improved article.

Since it was deleted after a discussion, you would need to find additional in-depth independent coverage /about him/ not brought up in the discussion which shows that he meets the inclusion guidelines, then see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Dru of Id (talk) 15:06, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]