User talk:Roon100

I will write/edit only those information which are correct and verifiable.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Roon100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked from editing or writing but I haven;t at all been involved in falsification or addition of any wrong information. I have been trying to restore the deleted page SAPTASWA BASU and in the second version of the page, I have given numerous updated links as references. I have tried to interact with Cirt who was key in deleting the page but he has been very rude in his response. You can check my activities in wiki and you will find that I am blocked for invalid reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. You haven't addressed the sockpuppetry that you have been blocked (by a checkuser) for. only (talk) 12:10, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.