User talk:Roobarb!

Hello, Roobarb!! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cheers,Je t Lover 23:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Re Help / Adoption

Thanks for getting in touch; however, "real world" issues mean that I won't be very active on WP for the next few weeks, so I'm probably not the best person to help you. Sorry. I'd suggest you have another look through the list of potential adopters and / or add {{subst:dated adoptme}} to your user page, to attract attention (with a bit of luck!). As for your proposed edits, be bold, but if you're unsure, discuss what you're suggesting on the talk-page and see if anyone responds. Have fun! Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 20:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salford Quays page

You did the hard bit, you added the new material; I just did a bit of tidying up. :)

I found that wikipedia took a bit of getting used to—not too many of us have tried to write encyclopedia articles before—and it is a bit different from other writing. I still make mistakes, and I have to refer to the Manual of style often, but it's a collaborative venture, so we all try to help where we can.

Keep up the good work. --Malleus Fatuarum 22:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS. You might like to consider joining the Wikipedia Greater Manchester project?

I wouldn't be so insensitive as to call anyone an estate agent :) I just felt that the level of some of the detail was becoming a little excessive, and starting to look like an estate agent's brochure: things like parking, access to the Galleria without going outside, whether you needed a card key or not to work the lift ... it can be difficult to get the level of detail "right". --Malleus Fatuarum 23:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Just wondering about the move of the IWMN detail from the Salford Quays to the Trafford Park pages... Should there not be IWMN content on the Quays pages? I feel that there should, as although I agree that the museum is certainly in Trafford Park, it describes and publicises itself as a Quays landmark. I think it would be an odd omission from the Salford Quays pages if it were not mentioned at all."

Well, my reasoning is that this an article about Salford Quays, not the Quays. The article says that the two terms are interchangeable, but I don't believe that they are; there were obviously quays on both the Manchester and Salford sides of the canal. Maybe there's scope for a "Quays" article? I'm not sure. But I certainly can't see the justification for including things that can be seen from Salford Quays, or are close to Salford Quays, as landmarks of Salford Quays. What do you think? Why do you think the IWMN ought to be included as one of Salford Quays' landmarks, as opposed to one of Trafford Park's landmarks? --Malleus Fatuarum 21:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Teesnewportbridge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Teesnewportbridge.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:25, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]