User talk:Ronmax
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]Hi Ronmax! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Ronmax, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Policy
[edit]The policy Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Balance which states " However, when reputable sources contradict one another and are relatively equal in prominence, describe both approaches and work for balance. This involves describing the opposing views clearly, drawing on secondary or tertiary sources that describe the disagreement from a disinterested viewpoint." We have two sources of equal repute that contradict each other and so we present them both equally. The info box is used for simple information and since the birthdate is not simple and requires context, we simply do not include it in the info box and we do not make our own personal commentaries about the sources in the article. While an individual may know their own age , it is all too common for people to publicly disclose an age that is not their actual age. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- The basic answer to all of your questions is: Policy.
- people are only acceptable for non promotional/non controversial claims about themselves. That other reliable sources have different dates means that there is a controversy and her word alone is no longer sufficient.
- amazon is a commercial website whose primary goal is to sell its products it is not a reliable source
- any other content that did not have a reliable source was also removed
- The remaining content is insufficient to require divisions into sections. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
At the Teahouse...
[edit]I responded to your query: Amazon link to a book ~Eric 71.20.250.51 (talk) 04:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC)