User talk:Ronaldo12345

Robert Camp

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Robert Camp, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.benchmarkingbestminds.com/camp.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Robert Camp

A tag has been placed on Robert Camp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld (talk) 11:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Robert Camp. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 11:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Robert Camp. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mayalld (talk) 11:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Robert Camp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please note that it is NOT enough to start from the copyvio text, then move some of the text around, and change words here and there. Articles MUST be written in your own words. Mayalld (talk) 11:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a {{hangon}} template to an article, Robert Camp. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 11:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Gbn logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gbn logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gbn logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Gbn logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]