User talk:Ronald Chien

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Yongkang, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yongkang was changed by Ronald Chien (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936074 on 2012-02-23T11:16:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was false positive. – Ronald Chien (talk) 11:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China article

Since you said on your user page that you are from the Republic of China, I guess you are interested to share your view at Talk:Republic of China#Requested Move (February 2012). Thanks for your attention. 61.18.170.10 (talk) 12:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 02:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ronald Chien (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am using an ISP with dynamic IPs.

Decline reason:

That does not address the reason for the block. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:57, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ronald Chien (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was false positive, an accidental match of dynamic IP addresses.

Decline reason:

Per remarks below by the blocking admin. The coincidence of other users using the same IP would be one thing, but when they are editing witht he same voice, well that's just too many coincidences for them to actually be coincidences. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

}

The block was placed after checkuser indicated that Ronald Chien had abused a large amount of dynamic IPs, making edits similar to ones that were made using this account. Most, if not all of the IPs that shared the same UA as Ronald Chien have been at one point or are currently blocked. I'll leave the decision about unblocking in the hands of other administrators. Tiptoety ^talk 06:02, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]