User talk:Ron Daker

My name is Ron Daker!

Speedy deletion nomination of Kazakhstan, Greatest Country in the World

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kazakhstan, Greatest Country in the World, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. →Σ τ c. 21:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Kazakhstan, Greatest Country in the World, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --Davejohnsan (talk) 21:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Kazakhstan, Greatest Country in the World, you may be blocked from editing. Slon02 (talk) 21:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Slon02 (talk) 21:46, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ron Daker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know what you're talking about, I'm not John... there's no relationship at all Ron Daker (talk) 23:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The sockpuppetry is pretty evident, given how both accounts have engaged in the same juvenile Borat-related vandalism. Kinu ^t/_c 00:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's also worth noting that Ron says "I'm not John... there's no relationship at all", and John says "I'm not this Ron Daker - there's seriously no relationship" -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- And, oops, Ron also edited John's talk page. Facepalm --Kinu ^t/_c 00:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ron Daker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I like to make sexy time!

Decline reason:

Well you'll have to make it elsewhere, because your Talk page access has been revoked -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.