User talk:Rommel's editor

On the topic of Aboriginals

Hi, I'm Kline and I just reverted your edit on Hudson's Bay Company because, well, Canada also uses Aboriginals for First Nations/"Indians". Hope you understand. Kline | yes? 03:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moving conversation here to keep it in one place.

===Rommel's editior===

Hello i thank you for your concern about the north American fur trade page. i wouldn't say that it is a mistake on your part but a simple misunderstanding. i did adequately explaining what i changed, and why. By saying that i was "changing the word Aboriginal to Indian or first nations because Aboriginal referrers specifically to Australian indigenous people." Because we have distinct histories sperperate from each other with uqence histories. With first nations and Indian being the proper name for north american indigeous peoples. so i would like to humbalily ask you restore my edit. thank you so much for your cheerfulness and wish you a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rommel's editor (talk • contribs) 20:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm suggesting that you use the article's talk page to gain consensus WP:CONSENSUS from the community of editors before making sweeping changes like that. Additionally, you might want to post an inquiry on the talk page of WikiProject Indigenous People of North America, which can be found HERE. Thank you, and best regards, Netherzone (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Manning

Some of the content - like red scare, radio programs etc - which had references was indeed very good. Unfortunately, because of a mistake when it came to the referencing even the good parts got reverted. At a minimum, I think you can add back 90% of the text, as it's all referenced. just make sure to watch out for adding the page number. I think you added the total pages with the specific page, and that's why it messed it up. Have a great day. Hemanthah (talk) 11:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oil production in Alberta.

Hello, Rommel's editor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oil production in Alberta., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Cosmic6811. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Anthony Henday, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Cosmic (talk) 06:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The last citation for the legacy section is finished, you had me a little worried when you said the source wasn't reliable. Cause like I already said the source I used was an official government document produced by the government of Alberta for educational purposes, and was created and assembled by official government historians. I don't know know where you can get a more reliable source from. But thanks again. Rommel's editor (talk) 20:25, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oil production in Alberta.

Hello, Rommel's editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oil production in Alberta.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thomas W. Hardwick has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thomas W. Hardwick. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Thomas Hardwick (disambiguation) and Hardwick (surname). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thomas W. Hardwick

Hello, Rommel's editor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas W. Hardwick, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas W. Hardwick

Hello, Rommel's editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas W. Hardwick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]