User talk:Rollscourt
A tag has been placed on Utopics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GlassCobra 18:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
why was this deleted today?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rollscourt (talk • contribs) 20:12, August 20, 2007 (UTC).
- It was previously voted to be deleted. Use Wikipedia:Deletion review if you disagree with the outcome of a deletion discussion. Stifle (talk) 19:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Copyright status of Geoffrey Pugen
[edit]Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Geoffrey Pugen. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://www.subtletechnologies.com/2007/?page_id=96 in this case) or from printed material.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Geoffrey Pugen with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Geoffrey Pugen with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 23:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)