User talk:Rollingbananas

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rollingbananas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

JamesBWatson (talk · contribs),Im sorry I dont understand why I have been blocked. This does not make sense. Can you please Explain why Ive been blocked. This is my sole and single account. Youve got me confused for some other person bro.Rollingbananas (talk) 05:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Seems like an obvious case of sockpuppetry to me. Max Semenik (talk) 06:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rollingbananas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sock Puppetry by whom, what account. This doesnt make sense. Can you please point in a specific direction ? Like sockpuppet of what account? I barely have 40 edits and theyre all legit. Theres nothing that would even qualify as trying to influence or whatever which is what sockpuppets are. Please be gentle ? Rollingbananas (talk) 06:36, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're blocked as a sockpuppet of Anonymousbananas (talk · contribs). Having run a checkuser, my assessment is the technical connection is Likely. PhilKnight (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rollingbananas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just checked the CheckUser logs. There was never a CheckUser run against my username. and EVEN if there was, I'm on a floating IP, highly "Likely" to be misunderstood as someone else. Its slightly hard to udnerstand, A person can be accused of SockPuppetry only when it meets the following criteria

Creating new accounts to avoid detection
Using another person's account (piggybacking)
Logging out to make problematic edits as an IP address
Reviving old unused accounts (sometimes referred to as sleepers) and presenting them as different users
Persuading friends or acquaintances to create accounts for the purpose of supporting one side of a dispute (usually called meatpuppetry)

none of which has happened. Is there any proof. If i WAS a sock-pupetter person, i wouldve simple made naother account and moved on instead of fighting to keep this one.Rollingbananas (talk) 12:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Enough time wasting. No, you couldn't check the checkuser log because it's not public. Talk page access revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 12:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.