User talk:Rolfalmao

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Donna meistrich has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Pparazorback (talk) 01:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Speedy deletion nomination of Donna Meistrich

A tag has been placed on Donna Meistrich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. magnius (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

I deleted the page which you created for Indian "remakes". Such trivial lists are not appropriate on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. If you want to start a new discussion, you are welcome to do so. Thank you, Shahid • ^Talk2me 17:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not revert again until consensus is reached, else the page will be protected from editing and you could be blocked. As I said, it was discussed - this is not a relevant page in an encyclopedia. Not all your sources are reliable. If a film is a copy, the film article is where this info is relevant, not elsewhere. Shahid • ^Talk2me 22:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of drug-related deaths

Hi there. Just letting you know I've reverted your unexplained change to this article. I think it is unnecessary as years of birth and death are already listed, and it is definitely not appropriate to only do it for the first letter. If you disagree and think it should be included start a discussion on the articles talk page so we can reach a consensus. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 04:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Final Fantasy Titles listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Comparison of Final Fantasy Titles. Since you had some involvement with the Comparison of Final Fantasy Titles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]