User talk:Rolandhelper

I'm a Ferry Roland. My Userpage Rolandhelper Can Be Edited by Anonymous And Accounts By Named Ferry Roland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.6.95.115 (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adobe CreatePDF.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 12:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

..........................................................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adobe CreatePDF

Please don't resubmit this submission over and over unless you actually do some work and improve it. Otherwise you waste everyone's time. Thanks, Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 13:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adobe CreatePDF.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 13:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My First Article is gone.

What Should I Do,Nole ? Are you Erase My Article? My Name Is Ferry Roland.

Speedy deletion nomination of Roland Kabigting

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roland Kabigting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. θvξrmagξ^spellbook 06:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ferry Roland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ferry Roland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 06:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lot And Lot, Any Editor May Be cause Havoc....

What Should I Do

What Should I Do.. I not happy right now.. but i still develop it. WHAT SHOULD I DO........................................................

...

WHAT SHOULD I DO

Easy

Developing Wikipedia Is Easier than i thought.

Talkback

Hello, Rolandhelper. You have new messages at Nolelover's talk page.
Message added 12:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 12:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:Acrobat.com, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. mabdul 16:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Rolandhelper, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 05:35, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Time is heading for great uploader!!!

~~I'm Wikipedia administrators~~.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.6.95.115 (talk) 10:51, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are not an admin and it is considered a serious wikicrime to pretend that you are one. (And what on earth made you think that you were the first Indonesian Wikipedian?) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:44, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Adobe LiveMotion has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. In this edit summary you didn't fixed any typo, you were adding a template! mabdul 15:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.

Roger,You Want to tell me something about createpdf? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolandhelper (talk • contribs)

You asked a question on my user talk page, so I replied there. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:58, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- @Rolandhelper: Really if you don't want to get blocked here too, learn something about copyright, licenses and please stopp uploading images especially if they are already online and accessible for the same project. Don't create talk page with the only text the the article in question needs expansion (we all know that already) and please sign your posts on talkpages with ~~~~. Regards, mabdul 12:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Adobe Flash Media Server.png

Thank you for uploading File:Adobe Flash Media Server.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mabdul 12:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Adobe Flash Media Server.png

A tag has been placed on File:Adobe Flash Media Server.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. mabdul 12:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Adobe CreatePDF.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Adobe CreatePDF.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mabdul 12:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Pixel Bender.png

Thanks for uploading File:Pixel Bender.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ok

Roger, I Likely Want To Upload Images To Wikipedia instead of Wikimedia Commons. And you too Mabdul, You Likely Want To Delete My Images!

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Mac OS has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Mushroom (Talk) 15:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Adobe Connect.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Adobe Connect.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 02:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Adobe BrowserLab.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Adobe BrowserLab.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 02:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Photoshop Elements.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Photoshop Elements.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 02:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Pixel Bender.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pixel Bender.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 02:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Adobe Flash Media Server.png

Thank you for uploading File:Adobe Flash Media Server.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 02:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Adobe CreatePDF.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Adobe CreatePDF.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 02:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

I see that you've removed the deletion tags. I am, though, still convinced that the non-free use rationales you've provided are insufficient. So, I've asked for clarification at WP:FNN#Special:ListFiles/Rolandhelper. →Σ τ c. 03:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Ferry Roland 03:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without [[Wikipedi!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> a:Verifiability|verifying]] it by citing reliable sources, as you did to History of Mac OS. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Don't revert it again without adding any reference! mabdul 12:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

Roland, hey. If you want to make the change you suggest, you're going to have to talk it over at WT:WPWPA. In fact, with one more Revert (even in good faith) you'll run afoul of WP:3RR and you may have a block put on you. No one, not a single person, wants that to happen, so it'll be much, much better if you just help us understand your rationale and explain your position at the talk page. Cheers! Achowat (talk) 13:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Achowat (talk) 14:27, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rolandhelper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please , unblock me, why you block me? I do not do anything. So help me to unblocked!

Decline reason:

That is not a reason to unblock. You clearly violated the three-revert rule, and continued edit-warring even after you were reported for doing so. -- tariqabjotu 01:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Adobe CreatePDF.png

A tag has been placed on File:Adobe CreatePDF.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ceradon ^talk_contribs 02:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...

I Tell You , Awohat. The Cast Iron Barnstar is needed and useful , Awohat. Mabdul, Is Very needed and fully useful. I will proctect that barnstar. THANKS!

I may be overstepping my bounds here, and if an Admin wants to scold me for what I'm about to say, so be it. But you weren't blocked for the Cast Iron Barnstar. You were blocked for edit warring and failing to use the Talk Page to build a consensus for your idea. When you come back, I'd hope you actually engage in discussion at WT:WPWPA. Your idea may have merit, you just need to help us understand it and let us help you shape it into what it could be. Cheers! Achowat (talk) 12:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Adobe CreatePDF.png

Thank you for uploading File:Adobe CreatePDF.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 22:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Adobe Flash Media Server.png

Thank you for uploading File:Adobe Flash Media Server.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 22:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Pixel Bender.png

Thank you for uploading File:Pixel Bender.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 22:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Photoshop Elements.png

Thank you for uploading File:Photoshop Elements.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 22:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Adobe BrowserLab.png

Thank you for uploading File:Adobe BrowserLab.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 22:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Adobe Connect.png

Thank you for uploading File:Adobe Connect.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 22:45, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Hello Rolandhelper, I'm happy that you like Wikipedia. It's possible that your article did not fit into Wikipedia standards. Thanks for your feedback! If you have any other questions about Wikipedia , please don't hesitate to ask on my talk page. Have a great day! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 18:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Rolandhelper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! mabdul 18:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

?

Easy... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.79.61.31 (talk) 04:20, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Protection Meanings

File Upload Wars Must Prevented With Upload Protection, Roger?

Your block has been extended

For continuing to evade your block I have extended it for another two weeks. For more specific information please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rolandhelper. Tiptoety ^talk 07:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Owh no!

Oh No! If i used the opera, I'm Still many Blocks! I'm Not like banned! It is I Am Doing To Upload Files And edit! Block Request Is Not Too Fine!

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rolandhelper for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. →Σ τ c. 05:41, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sock puppetry... Don't mine. Please don't longer the block. I've need to uploading anything else. I will do anything to expand this talk page. --182.0.251.57 (talk) 10:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rolandhelper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please.. I don't do anything else. 39.208.160.191 (talk) 02:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 02:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your block was originally imposed for edit-warring and neglecting the talk page, and was extended when you were using an IP to edit. Don't you think your unblock request would have had a higher chance of being accepted if you weren't using an IP to request it? →Σ τ c. 21:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What?????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ferry Roland (talk) 07:33, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IP Restricted 100%

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rolandhelper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello,I , Ferry Roland, I want to unblocked for continue editing. Please , i won't make edit wars! so, unblock, You can do it. Please do not indef block for me! If i can do , so unblock! please unblock me for uploading files and editing! please,unblock me!If I banned, I can unblock by IP! Unblock,please! When i want to editing/uploading, Unblock me! Also,Blocking me it's not neccessary. Ferry Roland (talk) 06:01, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"If I banned, I can unblock by IP!" sounds like a threat to evade your block using IPs to me, and threats like that will not get you unblocked. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:45, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rolandhelper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello,I , Ferry Roland, I want to unblocked for continue editing. Please , i won't make edit wars! so, unblock, You can do it. Please do not indef block for me! If i can do , so unblock! please unblock me for uploading files and editing! please,unblock me! Unblock,please! When i want to editing/uploading, Unblock me! Also,Blocking me it's not neccessary. Thanks,--Ferry Roland (talk) 08:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that your previous unblock request with this wording was declined, why do you think that re-posting it will lead to a different result? To be unblocked you're going to need to provide strong assurances that you'll edit productively in the future. I'd suggest seeing WP:STANDARDOFFER. Nick-D (talk) 10:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is actually a difference - the second request omitted the "If I banned, I can unblock by IP!". -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, This is the Second Request.First Request It's in above.

No, you can't give yourself a {{2nd chance}} - I have removed it now. You need to make unblock requests that genuinely address the problems, and then leave it up to admins to decide whether you should have further chances. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Regards,--Ferry Roland (talk) 10:21, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and please don't be offended, but you really don't appear to have sufficient competence in English to be working on a serious English language project like this - there is an Indonesian Wikipedia that you might be more suited to. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:25, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I like Indonesian Wikipedia,too.But, I'm Extremely suited in English Wikipedia.--Ferry Roland (talk) 10:31, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are not. I do not want to be rude, but your English is really not very good -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:39, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So,What Level i talks english? --Ferry Roland (talk) 10:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you persist in asking, I will say that your level of English very obviously is not good enough to create proper sentences or to conduct a simple conversation. And therefore not good enough for the English wikipedia. Even your unblock requests are very difficult to understand.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:52, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rolandhelper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Can't editing pages and upload files! I was evading too much blocks and I clearly violated 3RR. I will not distrupt and damage Wikipedia anymore! Please,Unblock me so i can do anything like editing,etc. So you must unblock me so I will not do it again!

Decline reason:

Sorry, but your English skills are clearly not adequate to edit English Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another problem is that you have also been editing (and edit-warring) logged out from a wide variety of IP addresses while also editing logged in on the same articles - it makes it look like a number of people are on your side in your disputes, when it is all just you. In fact, looking over your history here, almost everything you have tried to do here has ended in disruption and edit warring - you make a change, it gets reverted, so you log out and revert the revert, that gets reverted, you switch ISP to get a different IP, revert again... With that history, and your very poor English, I would strongly oppose any unblock. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rolandhelper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the next request. I want to unblocked because I not want violate 3RR again

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, request posted while logged out. You must log into your account to appeal your block. I agree with what Boing! said below - you'll get one more appeal (I won't count this one, since I declined it because you are logged out) but after that you'll need to take a break for a while or appeal elsewhere. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Note: This request was made by logged-out IP 39.209.141.77 -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Rolandhelper, you are just not listening here. Several of us have told you that your English is simply not good enough for you to work on the English language Wikipedia. It is also apparent that you are very young. Wait a couple of years at least, continue learning English at school, and you may then be able to rejoin the editing community here in the future. To save you wasting any more of your time repeating the same unblock request, I have now disabled your ability to edit this talk page. So if this request is declined, then I'm afraid it is your last one for a while - but if the reviewing admin disagrees with me and decides to unblock you, they will restore your access to this page at the same time. Finally, if this request is declined, you may still appeal to WP:BASC for unblock, but I think the chances of that succeeding at this time are very low. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:15, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rolandhelper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock. Thanks

Decline reason:

Sorry, but no. Please do as others have recommended and take some time off before requesting access to Wikipedia again. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 02:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Good

hello, zebedee, I know what I am.--39.209.141.77 (talk) 01:58, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rolandhelper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. Please Allow me to go. If you not want to accept it, i not want you. I will not violate the wikipedia's policy so, Allow me to do! This block is not needed! I want to upload files,move pages, and editing! I wont do any violating, Do not block me,Do not ban me! Please! I will do anything yo want!!! Please unblock me, What I can do!!!! PLEASE, UNBLOCK ME, AS I CAN DO, I WILL DO ANYTHING YOU WANT,UNBLOCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--114.79.60.78 (talk) 04:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your lack of understanding what's wrong is not nelping your cause, as well as your making of this request while not logged in. Max Semenik (talk) 06:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been told that your English is too poor, and you lack the maturity, for you to work on this English-speaking project. As you either do not understand that, or will not listen, I have protected this page to stop you making any further unblock requests. If you wish to appeal further, see WP:BASC for instructions. Otherwise, go and work on Indonesian Wikipedia and come back here when you are older and your English is better. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:31, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rolandhelper for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. →Σ τ c. 23:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Photoshop Elements.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Photoshop Elements.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. mabdul 13:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rolandhelper for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:16, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Adobe BrowserLab.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Adobe BrowserLab.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adobe Flash.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Adobe Flash.png, has been listed at Commons:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. –Be..anyone (talk) 05:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adobe Connect.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adobe Connect.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]