User talk:Rohith Kilari
March 2016
[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Laptop. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Laptop. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 15:39, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Rohith, if you keep adding tollyspice.com to articles, your account will be blocked indefinitely and the site will be added to the spam blacklist. Wikipedia isn't the place to advertise, and we only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking have to say about any given subject. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Rohith Kilari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Virtually first primary factor is Iam not related with tollyspice.com in anyway. Iam new to use Wikipedia. I've examined the rule "Wikipedia isn't for promotion". But i does not know adding more references to make articles strong is a way of promotion. Truly that internet site posts regularly the qualitative articles about Telugu language films. So i delivered them inside the references. Desire you understand. And that I got here to recognize my friend's account "Abhay Ram" was blocked announcing it's a sock puppetry of mine. Surely we stay in a room. And that I in most cases uses his laptop. So his ip address become located violated and my account became blocked. Now his account was also blocked. He does not use any additional accounts in Wikipedia. Iam not establishing my account from that computer from that day of block. And the internet site with domain tollyspice.com appears additionally blocked in Wikipedia. And its not my internet site, observe it. I've sincerely stated why i used to feature urls from that site above. I dont hassle of me. Because of me, I dont like to block the domain tollyspice.com and "Abhay Ram" account. So i request Wikipedia to unblock "Abhay Ram" from blocks and tollyspice.com from spam blacklist. If possible, unblock me too. If unblocking me is not possible or if i had failed in making you trusted towards me, please unblock tollyspice.com and Abhay Ram. Rohith Kilari (talk) 13:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Even now, your only interest here is related to that website. I don't see how unblocking you would help Wikipedia. Max Semenik (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- How did you know tollyspice.com had been added to the spam blacklist? And how do you figure that removing tollyspice.com from the blacklist will improve Wikipedia? The site serves no useful purpose as a reliable source, because it's a blog. So if we removed it from the blacklist, then what? We'd have to keep removing a problematic source from Wikipedia? That doesn't seem to make any sense. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Rohith Kilari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Iam not able to understand why Wikipedia is doubtful on me towards tollyspice.com. The question raised above is how did i know tollyspice.com had been added to the spam blacklist. Right? Type 'Rohith Kilari' in Wikipedia Search Box. In the everything category, one of the links showing Spam Blacklist which redirects to [1] mentions my name stating i started the whole thing. Are you clear about the place where i got about it? I just asked it to remove from the blacklist because my name was clearly stated in it. Iam the reason for its block. That is why, i request Wikipedia administrators to remove it from spam blacklist. That's it. No more thoughts. Additionally, the user with username 'Abhay Ram' had been blocked becuase of me. Why should they suffer because of me. Thats why i would leave Wikipedia. Before leaving, i request the user and the domain to be removed from block and spam blacklist respectively. Really i have no more criminal ideas. Trust me. I became the problem for Wikipedia. Believe me i would not edit any more articles. Max Semenik (talk) Rohith Kilari (talk) 17:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you don't want to edit Wikipedia any further there's no need to unblock your account. TollySpice is not a reliable source and should not be used as a reference on Wikipedia. If your friend wants to be unblocked, he should request that himself. However, since there's no discernible difference between his edits and yours, WP:MEAT would apply. Huon (talk) 17:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rohith Kilari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
how can he request if his account's talk page had been also blocked? Iam ready to make edits for Wikipedia. But Wikipedia recognised me as spam unnecessarily. Wikipedia finds problem with me. Wikipedia does not take my references as eligible. It says iam unfit for Wikipedia. Right? How does i know TollySpice is reliable or not? Even that website posts qualitative posts. That's the reason made me add those links. Iam keep on requesting but Wikipedia does not care all of my words. Iam shameful to say that the username 'Abhay Ram' and domain tollyspice.com blocked because of me. Who am i to make others accounts and websites block? 'Abhay Ram' user talk page was also blocked saying everything is protected in the template, he said. That is why iam begging you these many times. (talk) (talk) Rohith Kilari (talk) 18:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Our CheckUser process determined that all these accounts are related, and all the accounts have demonstrated similar behavior, i.e. spamming tollyspice.com. You've given us no indication that you have any ability to contribute beyond adding spam. Please stop opening frivolous unblock requests, or talk page access will be revoked. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:59, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rohith Kilari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would never add links from domain tollyspice.com. Please forgive fot this time. This is my first and last mistake. Please unblock me, user 'Abhay Ram' and domain tollyspice.com. How can i make you believe? Iam requesting since 30 Maarch 2016. I promise you guys. I never do mistake in future. I will not repeat again. Rohith Kilari (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
With the exception of one edit in 2013[1] where you made a constructive change, virtually every other edit you've made has included links to tollyspice.com, along with ridiculous fluffy, promotional editorials like
Or this problematic addition:
It doesn't seem to me that you understand what an encyclopedia's purpose is--you seem more interested in writing content better suited for trade rags, I don't get the sense that you have the English skills required to contribute effectively, you've amply demonstrated that you are only here to promote, and you've not demonstrated any significant ability to contribute constructively. As for Abhay Ram, there is no way that account will be unblocked because (as previously mentioned) a CheckUser indicated that you are linked to both accounts, and Abhay Ram was used to continue the same disruption. I will not be removing tollyspice.com from the spam blacklist because it provides no benefit to our readership. It's neither a reliable source, nor is it suitable for inclusion as an external link. The Wikipedia community doesn't care what random blogs have to say about anything. Further, you never answered my question about how you learned that tollyspice.com had been added to the spam blacklist.
Now, please stop opening new unblock requests. If you open another unblock request, I will revoke your talk page access. If you want to reply below, feel free, but do not open a new unblock request. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.