User talk:Rohanamanjula123

--Rohanamanjula123 (talk) 12:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)create the page but consider checking the search results below to see--Rohanamanjula123 (talk) 22:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rohana manjulawm, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Brad v 04:37, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hellp me old accunt dellet--Rohanamanjula123 (talk) 10:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC) {{db-user}}--Rohanamanjula123 (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC) I've never done anything wrong and I was blocked! Please advise.--Rohanamanjula123 (talk) 12:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--Rohanamanjula123 (talk) 12:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ROHANA MANJULA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:ROHANA MANJULA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brad v 12:22, 24 May 2018 (UTC) I[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rohanamanjula123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Rohanamanjula123 (talk) 12:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. You had three, which just wastes time. Also, you did not address your violations of WP:SOCK, so there are no grounds to consider lifting your block. Yamla (talk) 13:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Rohanamanjula123 (talk) 12:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)'ve never done anything wrong and I was blocked! Please advise. --Rohanamanjula123 (talk) 12:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note additionally, you are not eligible for unblock consideration here. You need to make your unblock request on your original account, Rohana manjulawm (talk · contribs). I'm revoking talk page access as a result. --Yamla (talk) 13:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]