User talk:Rohaanhaq12

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rohaanhaq12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only signed in and never used the MovenpickResidencesHajarTowerMakkah account to edit nor the Ip address

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know. I've now blocked this account directly. Until MovenpickResidencesHajarTowerMakkah is unblocked, you are not welcome here. Yamla (talk) 10:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I only signed in and never used the MovenpickResidencesHajarTowerMakkah account to edit" This is not factually accurate. We've simply deleted the spam from that account. --Yamla (talk) 10:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rohaanhaq12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked from the English Wikipedia because I have took the time to learn all of Wikipedia's rules about editing what I can and can't do. I understand that I was editing Wikipedia with multiple accounts in a bad manner. I also was trying to promote a business on Wikipedia, but this caused more harm than good. I understand that this has caused a lot of damage of Wikipedia. These accounts include: Mohammed Haq, Rohaanhaq123, User:BonkerBoy123, Mohammedbhaq, Rohaanhaqaccount, MovenpickResidencesHajarTowerMakkah, Scott Dinah and this account. I have now realised that my behaviour on Wikipedia from the past will not be tolerated here. I have now changed and I am now seeking a second chance. Previously, I used to vandalise pages and promote businesses. If you choose to give me a second chance, I promise I will not abuse my editing privileges again. Please put all my bad edits in the past and it is now time to move on. I will edit articles properly, like adding to stubs and providing accurate information. I will say it again, I will not abuse my power to edit again. If I do choose to abuse this, I will accept my block and appeal it in a proper manner, rather than carry on with my problematic edits, which is not welcomed here. I understand that the way I edited Wikipedia was wrong and I am willing to make up for my mistakes and start from the beginning again. I will no longer use my account to promote businesses as I now know it is not an advertising platform, nor my own website/hosting platform. I will also not post anything related to business advertising or spam Wikipedia with it. Sorry to be rude in my appeal but mark my words. I will keep to my promises. I also take back all the problematic edits I have made in 2019/2020. Please believe me and forget my past. Also please delete the other accounts if possible.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rohaanhaq12 (talk) 19:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note: I see no evidence of recent block evasion. Note that at least one account, MovenpickResidencesHajarTowerMakkah, is globally locked. Note also that they have enough instances of block evasion and sockpuppetry that they may be considered banned by the community rather than just blocked. --Yamla (talk) 12:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I am just asking you to forget my past and to admit what I am saying is true, as right now, you are not believing me because of my past attitude and behaviour on Wikipedia is so bad. I am swearing with my life! Rohaanhaq12 (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]