User talk:RogerRadbit
{ping|Beeblebrox}}
I don't think this is appropriate behaviour of your moderators or in line with your blocking policy.
I accept I made an edit and don't agree with their logic or decision making.
Then other administrators with no authority chose to deny the block which is also against your policies.
I intend to make no further edits to the original post and I was blocked because I said I didn't vandalise anything which is silly and now I can't contribute. Don't think I've been warned before that so if seems heavy handed.
June 2023
[edit]This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Ponyobons mots 22:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't vandaliSe anything. RogerRadbit (talk) 11:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
RogerRadbit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm intending to make no further edits and I haven't vandalised anything, in future I would try to use the talk page as I have before on other edits RogerRadbit (talk) 16:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you are not planning to make further edits, there is no reason to remove the block.
Why are you being so pedantic for ? I clearly meant on they post PhilKnight (talk) 17:08, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RogerRadbit (talk) 16:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ponyobons mots 20:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)RogerRadbit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
has my block removal request been deleted? Here it is again. I don't see that it was a deliberate attempt to disrupt the page if I'm honest as I said that some people theorise.. this is part of a neutral outside debate on the matter. Noone disputes that it's bad for the region but it wildly accepted that some Ukr and Russians are working together. I understand your reasoning but respectfully disagree that it was deliberate. It was in good faith.
I intend to make no further edits on this page. RogerRadbit (talk) 16:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not provide sufficient assurance that the inappropriate edits will not recur nor tells us what edits you intend to make instead. 331dot (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RogerRadbit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm so sorry for not begging and being subservient to you oh great sysops. You are definitely the best ever. Please allow me to be unblocked and use your great powers to allow me to contribute. 🤣
Mad how silly and pedantic you are. Goodbye RogerRadbit (talk) 17:34, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
OK, bye. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.