User talk:Rogblr

Welcome!

Hello, Rogblr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Indian classical dance may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

from other Classical Dance forms, have also performed on invitations from Sangeet Natak Akademi (like, Gaudiya Nritya artist performed in 'Natya Sangam' in 2009. While the [[Encyclopædia

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Indian classical dance

Hi, Thank you for including the images. Could you please let me know of any specific reason behind removing the size restriction of the images. The images run way beyond the texts and does not look proper. The images can be clicked and zoomed anytime. The alternative would be include all the images as part of a gallery. Your thoughts please. Thanks. --Karan1974 (talk) 04:36, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Indian classical dance. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 08:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —SpacemanSpiff 09:40, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Gadurr (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]