User talk:Rodger Kroell

Welcome!

Hello, Rodger Kroell, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 22:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rodger Kroell! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Why Are Only Some of My Scholarly Edits Undone?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Philip Weiss. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not add "original research" or "novel syntheses" to the Philip Weiss Wikipedia biography. The two articles referenced in this Wikipedia biography which claim Weiss is an antisemite are NOT sourced. I can either point this out in bracketed notes following these claims [Example: Weiss did not actually murder President Abraham Lincoln on March 30, 2022, as the unsourced Wikipedia articles quoted in the Wikipedia biography suggests, because Lincoln died on April 15, 1865.] or I can delete the entire section of the Wikipedia biography claiming Weiss is an antisemite because this section consists of nothing but false claims from these two unsourced articles. Which would you prefer I do? Rodger Kroell (talk) 03:08, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those bracket notes are your analysis of those opinion columns and considered original research. You were supposed to delete the text that you dispute and then discuss the removal on the talk page and then the BLP Noticeboards; not insert your commentary into the article itself. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:21, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will do this from now on.~~~Rodger Kroell Rodger Kroell (talk) 06:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]