User talk:Rockysmile11/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Proposed deletion of Thank You (4Minute song)

The article Thank You (4Minute song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is just a song on the album that was released as a music video. It did not have a campaign to promote it as a single and thus does not have notability on its own. It should be merged into the 4Minute World. The chart performance data is copied from the album and does not reflect the individual single.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

The article was re-created by an unregistered user who has been trying to add unsourced secondary singles to 4Minute albums, so I am hoping this can be deleted without controversy. I remember you helped curb his previous posts, and would appreciate your help on this. Thanks. AngusWOOF (talk) 17:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: No objections on the deletion of this article from me since I agree on all the points you made and that the song wasn't released as a single & lacks notability. Other than that it can be safely deleted. Rockysmile11 (talk) 05:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

TV Shows as primary sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Murdoch_Mysteries_episodes&diff=638753017&oldid=638680144 I agree that TV shows are primary sources, but the summary is not the TV show and it still needs a ref. Some of the material in this article has been copied from other sources which is another reason sources should be used: so that we can confirm that the material is original. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

@Walter Görlitz: If there is copyrighted material that was directly copied from the sources, they I will have to check and get them removed and written into our own words. However again on WP:TVPLOT, unless the episode is upcoming or lost, references are not required as long as the plot summaries are only making descriptive claims, and not "analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about information found in a primary source." If I have spare time, I would like to expand the short, one-lined summaries in a paragraph. Rockysmile11 (talk) 15:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wings (duo), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mnet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Avoiding redundancy in captions

Hi, I think you may possibly have missed the key point here, that we actively avoid repeating things in articles. Where a section heading or gallery heading says vertebrates, we do not need to say 'it's a vertebrate' in captions because that is already clear to the reader. There is no need to revert a whole edit to fix a minor item like a bracket, we should just fix the bracket in such circumstances. With many thanks for your understanding. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

@Chiswick Chap: You were welcome to remove the rest of the sentence since I know nothing on this subject. Simply just found an error when I was browsing this random article and wanted to fix it. Thank you and have a great night. Rockysmile11^(talk) 08:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:26, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited G.NA discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BtoB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited H.O.T. discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spica Ghost.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spica Ghost.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spica I Did It.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spica I Did It.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Westmount Centre

The article Westmount Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indicia of notability, and of a size that per COMMONOUTCOMES is generally deemed non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Orange Caramel My Copycat cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Orange Caramel My Copycat cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Colors Miss A.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Colors Miss A.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4