User talk:Rocky70091/Lambeth Bible
Peer Review to Rebecca by Zanicka
[edit]Numerous headings & subheadings were added related to the topic. Under each of these headings & subheadings contain very strong and neutral information relating to the Lambeth Bible that the original source lacked.
Moved part of a paragraph into its own heading + added more information regarding the Provenance. ("Eric Millar proposed a Canterbury provenance...Bible's incomplete state.") This was a good choice to add.
The original lacked so many information such as the description and history of the Lambeth Bible, and Rebecca successfully adds these information on the sandbox.
The structure is very clear and organized. Very easy to follow, and Rebecca adds references relating to certain parts of the paragraph!
Recommendations:
Perhaps you can add the contents of the manuscript & its history? Zanickaa (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
More Peer Review by Zanicka
[edit]Suggestions:
Add:
- Heading: "History" with possible subheadings: "Origin"
- Heading: "Content" - what are the contents in this book? Maybe present an example page and talk about the style of the images and/or what influenced this style, if it has one.
- Any reproductions of this book? You can add this as a heading.
- Perhaps add what the material is made out of. Maybe adding a "Decorations" heading and describe its decoration, size, material.
- If there is a function to this book, you might want to add this as well!
- Overall, this has a very nice structure and balance. I wonder if you are adding more under the Iconography heading. Are there any other influences to this Bible? Speaking of which, when you are talking about Jacob's story under the Byzantine Influence subheading, you could also provide a visual image to visually present what you are talking about. A couple of words could also use the citing link to guide unfamiliar terms to another Wiki page. For example. the mosaics in Palermo and Monreale and the Second Crusade could use a citing link!