User talk:Rockjames630

This is Rockjames630's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: ApnaCourse (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Blatant advert.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ApnaCourse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ApnaCourse, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 06:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rockjames630! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KJP1 (talk) 06:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ApnaCourse in Wikipedia

Dear Sir,

May we request you to guide us as to how we can improve our article for Wikipedia. Do you have any tips that we can pick and make corrections to the article. we want our company profile to be up in Wikipedia which is the most sorted and searched site. Ours is a humble beginning and we do not want to by pass any of the rules laid down by Wikipedia.

Thank you --Rockjames630 (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not accept articles on companies simply because a company wants to have one. A company or organization must meet Wikipedia's notability criteria by already having been the subject of writings from reliable sources that are independent of the company.

You should never write about your own company due to the inherent conflict of interest. Your association with the company will impair your ability to write from the required netural point of view. Wikipedia has no interest in what a company wants to say about itself or how it wants to be portrayed.

Lastly, using Wikipedia for the purpose of publicity and promotion is explicitly disallowed. If your only interest is to tell the world about your company, there are many alternative outlets that allow this type of writing. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:29, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ApnaCourse

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:ApnaCourse, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John from Idegon (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]