User talk:Rocketman116
Welcome!
I would be interested to know how exactly you expanded upon the Sir Thomas Browne page other than adding citation needed ! Shall do them in my own time.Norwikian (talk) 00:52, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
[edit]Was this edit a mistake? It removed sourced content, and gave an edit summary which had no connection at all with the edit. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I first want to come off and apologize for doing edits while tired. This source here [1] as you stated is documented interview. The source itself no longer exists due to link rot that and the website being shutdown. What I should have done is cite it as a link rot. I looked if there was a archive sourced, I just haven't found any. Also just to add that I did not mean to remove the sentence only the source, that was a accident.Rocketman116 (talk) 13:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- You seem to have removed completely the wrong sentence. Both the edit summary you used and the link you give above refer to the News Of The World website, which, as you say, is dead. The only place where that site is referenced in the article is in a paragraph beginning "On 23 March 2009, a British woman gave..." However, what you removed was a completely different paragraph, beginning "In Australia, a woman was reported as leaving her house..." and referenced to an article in New Scientist, which is still a live link. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
You have been reported for sock puppet investigation
[edit]You have been reported for a sock puppet investigation as a suspected sockpuppet of User:Battlecry here: [2]--R-41 (talk) 18:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
I been on Wikipedia far longer then both of you, since December of 2006. My writing style is totally different with different views.You can gladly look at my posting record to know I differ greatly from Battlecry.--Rocketman116 (talk) 12:28, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
File:KTYT.PNG missing description details
[edit]If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:12, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Rocketman116. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)