User talk:RockMusicFan 2002

Welcome!

Hi, RockMusicFan 2002. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:09, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man! I really appreciate it! I hope to do good for Wikipedia for the near future! RockMusicFan 2002 19:42, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RockMusicFan 2002, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RockMusicFan 2002! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Why, thank you! I appreciate it. RockMusicFan 2002 12:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, RockMusicFan 2002. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Garage rock task force

Hello, I see you are new here! I was wondering, would you be interested in joining our garage rock task force? If so, I ask you go here (Wikipedia:WikiProject Rock music/Garage rock taskforce) and sign up by following the instructions on the page. That way, you can be involved in a group of editors with similar interests in rock music! Hope you can help out, thank you.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 04:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An extended welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your request for advice [1], and didn't see any responses, so I thought I might be able to help.

If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 16:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Murph9000 (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please look carefully at page history when reverting

Lausanne Collegiate School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Hi there. When you reverted a change at the above article, you actually reintroduced the problematic content (which I have now removed). The IP user added it and then immediately removed it. Because you only undid one revision, you added their content back into the article. Please always look at the page history and make use of the diff links there to check. Thanks. Murph9000 (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

Your statement "if you haven't socked for at least a year, you may create a new one" is not based in reality. You cannot edit here, under any account or IP, unless the block on your original account is successfully appealed. You are not eligible for a "clean start", ever.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]