User talk:Robynloud

Welcome!

Hello, Robynloud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tiwa Savage, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Filing Flunky (talk) 23:43, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tiwa Savage

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tiwa Savage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Filing Flunky (talk) 23:43, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Congratulations, Robynloud, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! Thank you for helping improve and expand music-related content in the encyclopedia, and for all your contributions. Keep up the great work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 22:40, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Young Money (group) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Lloyd and Birdman

Tupac Shakur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Posthumous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Can you stop adding a load of subsection titles in? Okay? Thanks. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 22:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rihanna

Please see the discussion at Talk:Rihanna#Biography_sub-section_titles; it relates to your recent edits. SplashScreen (talk) 07:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk That Talk

Do not undo my edits and not provide a reason for doing so, like you did at Talk That Talk. The singles' charts do not belong in the album article. The correct place to edit that kind of information is at Rihanna discography. Till I Go Home (talk) 08:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Please, when your citing sources, please use the full style. Don't just wrap the ref links around them. I have to continually go into what you edit and correctly source them. And that takes away from my time on Wikipedia. Thank you. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 16:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really? You have to ignore what I just asked you? You're unreal and it's quite rude. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 23:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And do not copy/paste something from an article. That violates WP:Plagarism and is against the law and can get you and the site in trouble. Either re-write in your own words or do not contribute because now I have to over-look everything you've put up. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 23:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Million Lights

Can you please stop violating WP:PLAGARISM when you edit this article. And please correctly source per WP:CITE. You continue to be sloppy in your editing on this article, and it's a bit tedious. Please pay attention to this. We have to go through and almost redo the whole article since it's a mess. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 21:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to read up on WP:SONGS and WP:ALBUMS. You keep going against these pages and it's a bit tedious. Read up on them before I do go and take possible action against you. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 02:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rihanna

Hello there, please see the discussion on Talk:Rihanna. SplashScreen (talk) 01:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 17:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Nicki Minaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foxy Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting without edit summaries

Please do not revert other editors without providing an edit summary explaining why you found the edit to be unacceptable. Reverting without summary effectively marks the edit as vandalism.—Kww(talk) 15:54, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Teairramaripromshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Teairramaripromshot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 10:46, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

all uploaded images deleted

Robynloud, I have deleted all of the images you have uploaded. The claim you have made that the images are under the free creative commons licence is obviously incorrect and the images were blatantly violating the rights of the copyright owner. Please do not claim a free (creative commons) licence for images taken from commercial websites or any place where the licence is not explicitly stated- Peripitus (Talk) 10:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at "File:CheryCole at Cannes 2012.jpg. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again?

Your addition to Channel Orange has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 00:56, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Aaliyah_second_posthumous_album, Robynloud!

Wikipedia editor Theopolisme just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the new article!

To reply, leave a comment on Theopolisme's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

August 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Ocean. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 14:05, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to God Forgives, I Don't has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 14:08, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Talk That Talk. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 22:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aaliyah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Dan56 (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One Woman Army

Hello, I'm Lil-unique1. I noticed that you recently removed some content from One Woman Army without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CherylColeunderthesunvideo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CherylColeunderthesunvideo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Call My Name (Cheryl Cole song) does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:44, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Aaliyah second posthumous album.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Aaliyah second posthumous album.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Screw You (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cole at Cannes 2012.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cole at Cannes 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hrs for continued bad image uploads despite previous warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rihanna's seventh album, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbadian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Aaliyah second posthumous album.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Aaliyah second posthumous album.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Girl on Fire (Alicia Keys album)

When articles about albums are created, we are required to meet specific criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. All articles on albums, singles or other recordings must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Unreleased material is only notable if it has significant independent coverage in reliable sources. An album should not have an article independent from the artist until its title, full track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label. When this information is lacking, the community guidelines require redirecting the article to that of the artist. Therefore, the Girl on Fire (album) article has been redirected to the Alicia Keys article. Outside of redirecting the article, our only option is deletion and salting. Realistically, any deletion discussion in this case would result in redirecting the article until we have the required content, supported by reliable sources (which do not include blogs). Accordingly, please do not restore the article content without the basic information required, supported by sources. For more information, please review: WP:NALBUMS and WP:CRYSTAL. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Cindy(talk to me) 00:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rihanna's seventh studio album for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rihanna's seventh studio album is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rihanna's seventh studio album until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — ΛΧΣ21™ 17:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rihanna's seventh studio album

Would you please stop adding in information that doesn't check out from it's sources. I went through all the sources, and cleaned the article up, and you keep restoring it. Quotes about what somebody said are irrelevant. If there's only one sentence in a section, there's no need for a new section. Zac 20:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Aaliyah second posthumous album.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Aaliyah second posthumous album.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CherylColeunderthesunvideo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CherylColeunderthesunvideo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copying into Justin Bieber article

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one page into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cheryl cole a million lights tour.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cheryl cole a million lights tour.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Please stop adding copyright-violating images you uploaded to the article Cheryl Cole or you will be blocked from editing as you were on Wikimedia Commons. -- Rrburke (talk) 23:40, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Your addition to Cheryl Cole has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 23:50, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Cheryl Cole shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 23:50, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add an inappropriate image to Wikipedia again, as you did at Cheryl Cole, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 23:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent bad image uploads. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robynloud (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Although I may have added several images that, have been found to be not free which I assumed was free. I do add important information to articles. Robynloud (talk) 13:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's not nearly enough to convince me that unblocking you will not put Wikipedia in legal danger. Max Semenik (talk) 14:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Repeatedly getting blocked in the recent past for adding different copyvio images to various articles is bad enough, but edit-warring to re-add the same non-free image to an article multiple times, even after the recent blocks, as in these recent examples: Undid revision 517486809 by Rrburke (talk), Undid revision 517488671 by Rrburke (talk) the image off cole in a blue dress is free!!! so stop removing it, unfortunately crosses over to competence issues. Having said that, perhaps a permanent restriction for uploading or inserting images to any article could possibly be a way out of this indefinite block, except if other text-based edits by this editor are also determined to have copyright issues. And by the way this only remaining image upload by this editor also looks like a copyvio. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 16:17, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've deleted it too. Max Semenik (talk) 19:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Max. Take care. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 22:46, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aaliyah X listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aaliyah X. Since you had some involvement with the Aaliyah X redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:32, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]