User talk:Roby2029!

Huyton-with-Roby vs Huyton vs Roby

I have reverted your changes on these articles as they are unsupported by any sources, and fundamentally change how the articles are read / understood and lack any argument or support for them. Huyton-with-Roby is not a single settlement, it is a historic Urban District and Parish containing two settlements.[1][2] Historically Huyton (a historic township) does not contain Roby (a historic township).[3][4] The Huyton article needs cleaning up of the cross-mixing of terms, not adding more confusion to other articles. Koncorde (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have further reverted changes made to Roby. You can review details of Huyton with Roby to see that the villages / townships / urban district etc do not cross into Liverpool and have been largely unchanged for over a century. Koncorde (talk) 19:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.

Hi there! I've noticed nearly all your edits so far have had to be reverted, it may help if you always remember to add an edit summary before pressing Save, this way other editors may be able to understand why you have made your edits and be able to improve on them rather than delete them. Please also remember all information must have citations from independent, reliable sources. I hope this doesn't put you off editing Wikipedia!

Orange sticker (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Prince consort, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:07, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roby2029!, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as RobyLiverpoolMersyside! (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 20:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both these accounts seem to be only mobile editing - and having nearly all their edits reverted - so may not have ever seen their talk messages - would a short block to get their attention be useful? Orange sticker (talk) 09:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Louie Tully

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Louie Tully requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 14:36, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Louie Tully

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Louie Tully requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 20:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm Roger 8 Roger. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to British Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Kindly communicate - use edit tags to summerise your edits Roger 8 Roger (talk) 06:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Orange sticker (talk) 10:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 20:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You have not provided any explanations for any of your edits, most or all of which have been reverted, nor have you responded to messages left here or on the talk page of what may have been an earlier account, User talk:RobyLiverpoolMersyside!. You were asked to explain yourself at WP:ANI, and failed to do so. If you wish to contribute positively, please explain why in an unblock request, and keep in mind that this is a collaborative project and not responding to concerns about your edits is not an option. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 20:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]