User talk:Robotwizard777

Man, that's some first entry...! Welcome aboard!!! - Lucky 6.9 07:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Template:Canada-stub has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Canadian Army Journal constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain what the vandalism was. As the editor in chief of this publication this would never be my intent, instead I have repeatedly tried to include a photo of the front cover of the journal, which I have permission to reproduce in educational forums such as this one. Please advise on how this may be done in accordance with your policies. With thanks in advance.

Fair use rationale for Image:CAJ4 Vol112.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CAJ4 Vol112.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Robotwizard777! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Andrew Godefroy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Godefroy Def Disc.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Godefroy Def Disc.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cover Def Disc Godefroy.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cover Def Disc Godefroy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Godefroy Heneker Bush Warfare.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Godefroy Heneker Bush Warfare.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 18:54, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William earnest bolton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William earnest bolton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William earnest bolton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. m'encarta (t) 02:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]