User talk:RobinHoodofSherwood

July 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:08, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. New to Wikipedia. Just tried to appeal my blocking, but this page isn't working. https://utrs.wmflabs.org/ - I get this error when submitting if this helps:

Notice: Undefined variable: query in /usr/utrs/production/public_html/src/appealObject.php on line 882

Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function execute() on null in /usr/utrs/production/public_html/src/appealObject.php:882 Stack trace: #0 /usr/utrs/production/public_html/index.php(75): Appeal::noSpamCheck('81.110.144.169') #1 {main} thrown in /usr/utrs/production/public_html/src/appealObject.php on line 882

Anyway, i'm here for the right reasons so please let me back in. I think I can understand why I've been blocked. I started by editing the page of a company I work with (LeftLion) and has had citation requests on it since November 2016, which I was trying to help with. The page was really out of date. I guess my username was naive, but it was because I was genuinely trying to improve Wikipedia.

Please can you compare the edits between the last one I made and the one Cullen328 hasjust reverted it back to? Our magazine has had 2 NEW EDITORS over the 4 YEARS since the wikipedia page was last updated. It really needs an update - which was what I was trying to do before I was blocked.

You guys must be really busy and not get time to read the edits i've spent the last 3 hours making. But please can someone try?

If you are unblocked, what articles do you intend to edit?

I love wikipedia and i'd genuinely like to make a contribution here.

I would like to edit the LeftLion page to make it accurate. Please can you assess the last edit I made before it was reverted back? If there's anything you think is too promotional then i'm happy to have it edited. Would just like the information on there to be accurate.

I'd also like to create some new pages because there are a fair few big things going on in the Midlands of the UK which i'd like to get on wikipedia. I'd just spent over an hour creating a new page for 'I'm Not From London' - which isn't a vested interest. They should just be on wikipedia. Can you have a look for that page as I really hope all the work has not not been lost because of my block.

Why do you think there is a block currently affecting you? If you believe it's in error, tell us how.

I'm not sure whether you'd class it as error, but basically I think your admin Cullen328 has seen my username (and possibly my email address) and is probably really busy and not had time to actually look at what I was trying to do and the edits I made.

Please let me back in and please revert the changes I made back to what they were. I made all those pages better and more accurate.

Is there anything else you would like us to consider when reviewing your block?

I love wikipedia. I'm here for the right reasons.

It's genuinely a bit heartbreaking to spend a few hours trying to make this place better and represent the things we know better (and factually correct) and then just get booted out of my account.

PPS - I've tried reading the userguides too and I hope i've gone about this the right way. Anyway, I guess i'll check back in a day or two and see if you can give me access to the account again.

BIG LOVE TO WIKIPEDIA!!! X

I did read your edits, which were promotional and mostly unreferenced. When you did add references, they were to your own website. This is typical of editors with a conflict of interest, and this type of editing is not acceptable. Wikipedia does not care in the slightest what LeftLion publishes about itself. The article must summarize what reliable sources independent of LeftLion say about it, such as the BBC. You need to create a new account, comply with Wikipedia's paid editing disclosure, and limit yourself to requesting edits at the article's talk page. Start with the staff changes. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aw mate. I'm really sorry you feel that way. I'm going to try and make some of those edits again, but i'll be cautious of not trying o incur your wrath for promotion and advertising. Ideally i'd really like to try and get rid of those citation requests from at the top of the page, which was why I probably added too many links that you deem as promotional.

globally renamed LeftLionTeam to RobinHoodofSherwood

globally renamed LeftLionTeam to RobinHoodofSherwood Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen328 - You seem to have banned my home and office IP completely from editing Wikipedia now? Can we discuss this? Seems quite severe. I'm happy to take your advice and try to learn more about how you'd like this done. But I was trying to reference other sources too.

I'm still learning how all this works. I'm genuinely trying tho. Wikipedia is lacking knowledge I have about the area I live in (East Midlands, Nottingham UK) and I was genuinely going to try and update some stuff on here for the greater good. I started with the LeftLion page as it's something I know lots about, but clearly I made some mistakes. Can someone let me know if you'll ever unblock my IP address and, if possible, reinstate this account? Or is this ban permanent and i'm just kicked out of Wikipedia for good?

Unblocked

You have been unblocked. Please follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines in the future. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:25, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lord of Milan (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Possibly notable, but needs better, secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lord of Milan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Lord of Milan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 10:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RobinHoodofSherwood! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SportingFlyer T·C 10:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lord of Milan (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A few troubling sources such as youtube and daily mail. Please review WP:RS. I agree this movie is notable, but most of the sources deal more with Kilpin instead of the documentary. Maybe find a few reviews from reliable sites and attach those and that should be enough to denote notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lord of Milan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Lord of Milan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'm Not From London (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I'm Not From London and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:I'm Not From London, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lord of Milan (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hasteur was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lord of Milan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Lord of Milan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hasteur (talk) 21:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:I'm Not From London concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:I'm Not From London, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:I'm Not From London

Hello, RobinHoodofSherwood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "I'm Not From London".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Lord of Milan

Hello, RobinHoodofSherwood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Lord of Milan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Lord of Milan

Hello, RobinHoodofSherwood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Lord of Milan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Macauley Langstaff (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero sources cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Macauley Langstaff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 22:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Macauley Langstaff

Hello, RobinHoodofSherwood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Macauley Langstaff, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Macauley Langstaff

Hello, RobinHoodofSherwood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Macauley Langstaff".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]