User talk:Roberttj1996
Your article 'A Word Of Warning' does not have any sources so it has been proposed for deletion. If you want to avoid deletion you need to add reliable sources or 3rd party sources which can be verifiable. Thank you Supdiop (talk) 12:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of A Word Of Warning
[edit]Hello Roberttj1996,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged A Word Of Warning for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Supdiop (talk) 10:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
A Word Of Warning
[edit]You cannot add the organisation's website as source as it is not independent source. Wikipedia only accepts reliable independent or 3rd party sources. Thank you Supdiop (talk) 10:53, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
The file File:A word of warning logo from website.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
orphaned file, no foreseeable use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
