User talk:Robertsefer

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DanRoan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DanRoan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Danroan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Danroan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dan Roan has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 07:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Dan Roan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 07:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Roan

Your recent edits to this article have been to remove "false personal information". However, you put this information into the article in the first place! Very strange. I have reinstated the infobox and categories that you deleted, but left your changes that removed unreferenced information. Somno (talk) 04:06, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dan Roan

The article Dan Roan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]