User talk:Robertpattinsons

Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	needed admin task. LissaCoffey (talk) 04:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 21:22, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Spamming and abuse of multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Robertpattinsons. This issue has also been discussed at WP:ANI. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robertpattinsons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

iam not promoting any specific website,iam just trying to add online references whereever required and they are not my websites,although i have added some links of mine to my profile page earlier but i removed them as and when notified and never added them again now.iam a big fan of wikipedia and i respect the admins here a lot.i request to be given a fair second chance Robertpattinsons (talk) 04:40, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to be unblocked you will need to address all of the issues that led to your block, i.e. not only the spam links, but also the abuse of multiple accounts (linked in the Sockpuppet investigation above). ~Adjwilley (talk) 18:56, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As per UTRS appeal #56226, this account is considered compromised. As per WP:COMPROMISED, no further unblock requests will be considered. --Yamla (talk) 07:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]