User talk:Robertmmuniz
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
Thank you for submitting an article at Wikipedia:Articles for Creation. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sultan Jahja. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article and resubmit when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Chzz ► 11:36, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]Thank you for submitting an article at Wikipedia:Articles for Creation. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sultan Jahja. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article and resubmit when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. avs5221 (talk) 13:39, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Jahja was created.
- The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
- Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
- If you would to help us improve this process, please consider
Thank you for helping Wikipedia! fetchcomms☛ 21:34, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
April 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Christianity in Africa has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. GorillaWarfare talk 02:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of U.S. Statehood for Puerto Rico
[edit]
I have nominated U.S. Statehood for Puerto Rico, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. Statehood for Puerto Rico. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
March 2012
[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Shlomo Sand. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 17:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
November 2012
[edit] Please do not add original research or novel syntheses to articles as you apparently did to Albert Nobbs. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Grandpallama (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
December 2014
[edit]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Raymond Leo Burke. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 19:42, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Robertmmuniz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)