User talk:Roberticus/Archivef2014Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:16:08 +000001am31= 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Roberticus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Roberticus, Nice to see you. I noticed you undid my revision. Thanks for your concern about the content. I have been watching TV and I know those examples are true. A TV fanatic would know. Other readers can use these as a references. DEJ88DP10 (talk) 19:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back with me, sorry I'm a bit slow to respond. This list has been inserted and removed a few times, and I am personally aware of many of the examples listed, but the problem with it is that it's totally unsourced. This is a problem for notability and accuracy of the list. The list itself is so long that it shows that this is a pretty routine occurrence in TV today, so examples with secondary sources show that a given case is notable enough to be covered in independent media. Second, when we don't have sourcing, there's no way to verify the info, so others may come and vandalise or mistakenly insert wrong or biased information, and how do you keep the article tight & accurate when there's no sourcing either way? Hope this helps explain my rationale here, and happy editing! Roberticus (talk) 15:23, 18 January 2014 (UTC)