User talk:Robertbanks

License tagging for Image:Barone 2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Barone 2006.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright permission

The note granting permission has to to be sent from an e-mail address associated with the website from which it is copied. —Centrx→talk • 00:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In order to use the text on Richard Barone on Wikipedia, it must be released under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). In order to confirm this permission, please:

Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Richard Barone (my talk page, User talk:Centrx may be preferable for quicker response) where we can find that note; or
Send an e-mail from rbarone(at)earthlink(dot)net to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org permitting re-use under the GFDL.

Only after this has been done can the page be re-created. Sorry for the inconvenience. —Centrx→talk • 17:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have, for the moment, restored the page. —Centrx→talk • 03:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By "for the moment" I mean only that if, several weeks from now, copyright permission is not confirmed by someone involved with Wikimedia permissions it will be deleted again. Don't worry about it. —Centrx→talk • 04:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do recommend that you find some external, reliable sources about, for example, the concert preparation or record sales. —Centrx→talk • 04:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Those were just some examples/suggestions of things that would have external, reliable sources. The point is that you should cite those sources. You don't need to cite every single minutiae, but the point is to cite the sources that attest to the notability of this person warranting inclusion in an encyclopedia. So, what I meant was link to an article on the Times website, make a citation for the Billboard listings. It is not that necessary, though, as I see there are mentions of the New York Times and the various record labels, but it would still be good to have. I hope you stick around and edit other articles, too. This is truly an important website. I have put a welcome message below that has useful information. I am leaving for the night, bye. —Centrx→talk • 04:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Robertbanks! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- —Centrx→talk • 04:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Alternative rock

It's more that they're somewhat obscure. Writing that article has always been a balance between referencing as many notable bands as possible while also trying to avoid it turning into name-dropping. After all, Let's Active could be listed in the same sentence, but they're not for basic readability purposes. WesleyDodds 04:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can always add it back if you want to. It's not my article (even if I did write most of it) or anyone else's; that's how Wikipedia works. I just personally feel in the greater scope of alternative rock as a whole they probably don't deserve a mention over other bands. They would probably better deserve a mention in a more specific subgenre page, such as jangle pop. WesleyDodds 05:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Rbarone.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rbarone.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bongos edo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bongos edo.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 07:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bongos_-_Drums_Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bongos_-_Drums_Cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bongos_edo_publicity.jpg

I have tagged Image:Bongos_edo_publicity.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Richard_Barone2006_1.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Richard_Barone2006_1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Barone_coolbluehalo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Barone_coolbluehalo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Clouds_Over_Eden.jpg

I have tagged Image:Clouds_Over_Eden.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Barone_Collection.jpg

I have tagged Image:Barone_Collection.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bongos - Drums Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bongos - Drums Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Barone Collection.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Barone Collection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi, we'd love to have images of Richard here, but they have to be free images due to Wikipedia's image use policies. And for them to be free images, we have to confirm that they are properly licensed by the copyright holder. The easiest way for you to do this is to post the images at richardbarone.com on a page with the statement that the images are licensed pursuant to the GFDL. Just make sure Richard controls the copyright. (For example, does Mick Rock own the rights to the 2007 shot?) Thanks, and if you have any questions, click on the word "seriously" in my signature at the end of this message to hit me up on my user talk page. -- But|seriously|folks 04:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did you not read this message? We can't just take your word that these images are freely available. People make false claims like that constantly. If you continue to post these images without following proper procedures, you will be blocked from editing here. Thank you. -- But|seriously|folks 01:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the Mick Rock photo at http://home.earthlink.net/~rbarone/index14.html carries his own copyright. If his 2007 of Richard also carries his copyright, then you need to prove that you have his permission to release it into the public domain. -- But|seriously|folks 01:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard, or Robert, or whomever you are: First of all, the article Richard Barone is not yours. It belongs to the community and is subject to the community's policies. Please review WP:OWN. Second, neither of you should be editing the article per WP:COI. Third, user accounts used by multiple individuals are not permitted per WP:USERNAME#Sharing_accounts, so please restrict this username so that only one person is using it. And finally, and this is your final warning (although I see you ignored the last one), if you upload any more images that do not comply with Wikipedia's image use policy, including WP:C, you will be blocked from editing. Thank you for respecting the rules of our community. -- But|seriously|folks 04:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I read the WP:OWN and I am also a part of the Wikipedia community, respectful of the rules. I have permission from the photographer to use this image (the one you have deleted twice) and would like it to remain on this page. It is not from the same shoot at the one on the web address you refer to (http://home.earthlink.net/~rbarone/index14.html) - but from a different situation, and we have free use of this image. Please just let us know what tag to use. Also, all the content of this page has been reviewed and edited with the assistance of master Wikipedia editors to be in encyclopedic style with factual content, without hyperbole. Please check the page's early history to see the strong scrutiny it received. Therefore, please allow Richard's Wikipedia entry to remain without tampering, and, if you would be so kind, tell me what tag to use to all the photo to remain. We have full use of it for all purposes. Thank you, Robert Banks.

You should be able to confirm your right to use the image the same way you established the right to use the text on the website, through the OTRS process. Send an email to "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org" explaining your connection to Richard and that the Mick Rock image was a work for hire or however Richard has the rights to it. It can be tagged with the license of your choosing, as long as it's within Richard's authority. So if he has all rights to it, you can choose PD, GFDL or Creative Commons. (Just don't use the "self" tags; those are for the creator only.)

You should also check to make sure Richard has the rights to the album cover art you've uploaded. If the rights belong to the labels or the photographers, they should be tagged as non-free album covers, not free images.

The COI tags should remain, because readers are entitled to know that Richard's associate has been heavily editing it so they can judge for themselves whether it has an astroturfing slant. (I do think it has some promotional overtones, by the way. For instance, I think the Bongos' role in the whole alt-college-guitar genre is overstated. Based on what I saw at the time, I would place them somewhere below the dB's but above the Feelies in terms of impact. Obviously, bands like R.E.M., The Smiths, U2, and the B-52's were at the top of that pyramid.)

Also, I should point out that while you have been editing here for over a year, most editors would probably still consider you a {{WP:SPA|single purpose account]]. If you are serious about being a Wikipedian, it would be to your benefit to edit articles unrelated to RB, participate in AfD or policy discussions, join a WikiProject or get involved in other areas. People are more likely to consider what you have to say if you have a broader Wikiexperience.

Let me know if you have any further questions, and happy editing! -- But|seriously|folks 08:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Barone_Hoboken07.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Barone_Hoboken07.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. But|seriously|folks 08:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK to delete.

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Bongos Hoboken.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:L1010166.JPG 2.jpg. The copy called Image:L1010166.JPG 2.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 07:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==File source problem with File:R Barone2007.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:R Barone2007.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ==

Soundvisions1 (talk) 12:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

==

Image permission problem with Image:FrontMan cvr sm.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:FrontMan cvr sm.jpg, which you've sourced to Backbeat and Hal Leonard Books. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ==

Soundvisions1 (talk) 12:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Barone iTunes.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Barone iTunes.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW (Talk) 03:31, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Richard Barone

Template:Richard Barone has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 02:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Barone coolbluehalo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Barone coolbluehalo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pete Seeger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beacon Theater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:31, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bongos Hoboken.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]