User talk:Robert the Noose

You blocked me for being a suspected sock? Is the Wikipedia NKVD so empowered now? Robert the Noose (talk) 13:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robert the Noose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No evidence of accusation. All race as biology supporters automatically banned. PC echo chamber. Robert the Noose (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robert the Noose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for being a sockpuppet. No evidence has been provided I am a sockpuppet. This exactly addresses the reason for my block. The view that race is biological is common e.g. [1] Your editors are a biased controlling clique. Not everyone that comments disapprovingly will be the same person. Nothing I was doing was disruptive and I was arguing in good faith and sincerely with a view towards fixing bias and error. Robert the Noose (talk) 15:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Continuing the editing that led to your block will not result in your block being lifted. Also, this is an obvious sock of a banned editor. As your appeal are disruptive, I am removing TPA. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.