User talk:Robert at Citizens for Freedom of Information
August 2015
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 03:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Robert at Citizens for Freedom of Information (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
To Wiki Adminstrators, the user Drmies placed a block on my account for no rightful reason. I have provided many reliable sources to my changes on the Wiki pages and yet Drmies and his other proxy accounts have accused me of acting in vandalism. I would suspect that he is an undercover political agent or operative or a unprincipled overzealous pro-Beijing activist since all my changes are warranted and supported by evidence. One need only ask a person fluent in Chinese and who lives in Hong Kong to know that 1) there is a media frenzy that is notable and important to preserve in Wikipedia of the public's comparison of Donald Tsang and Donald Duck and 2) CY Leung has earned the misnomers "689" and "evil wolf" that has been widely circulated in local newspapers and publications. These two things are common knowledge in Hong Kong and it is in the public interest to preserve them on Wikipedia. It is a shame that my account has been blocked for adding credible information supported by reliable sources. I appeal this most unfair ruling with the greatest urgency to preserve the freedom and preservation of information. Thank you. Robert at Citizens for Freedom of Information
Decline reason:
Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. --jpgordon::==( o ) 05:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Robert at Citizens for Freedom of Information (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This account should be unblocked as soon as possible because the block is in fact not necessary to prevent damage or disruption. The changes conducted by the account were legitimate and supported by reliable sources; though contested, the changes were following normal protocol for discussion and reversion of edits. It is unfortunate that my edits were removed with no legitimate reason other than possible political motivation and censorship. Also, the editor " jpgodon"'s allegation that I engaged in "personal attacks" is grossly unfounded. If you would read the first unlock request, I neither participated in name-calling, bullying, taunting, or false accusations; I merely wrote that I would "suspect" there are ulterior motives at play because of the extensive history of people censoring the Donald Tsang and CY Leung pages and ignoring/wrongly dismissing the information backed up by sources I had added to those pages.
Decline reason:
I have reviewed your edits and they appear to be clearly disruptive, as do your unblock requests. TigerShark (talk) 13:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.